Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams, and skills such as cooking or dressing should not be taught. To what extent do you agree/disagree?
In these days, beside teaching students theoretical knowledge, whether they should be provided some soft skills has aroused people's discussion. I contend that these young generations should be improved in both academic and practical knowledge.
There are some reasons why people support for opinion of only teaching student academic subjects. Firstly, since they access to any compulsory subjects at schools or universities, they can gain deeper insight into the areas of specialisation. In fact, learners have opportunity to explore new phenomenon and hidden messeges around them, which they are likely to broaden their horizons in many fields of study. Secondly, by examination results, they are supposed to be eligible for which academics levels they srtand. This means that without an adequate knowledge, students may fail their exams, have to study these subjects again, which they are not able to have better academic performance.
However, I am in favor the idea that practical skills are of great benefit for student to learn. First of all, some practical ones such as cooking, sewing or other skills provide learners fundamental skills, help them to realize their potential and strengths, As an result, they find it so efective and amusing after many hours of studying academic subjects. Moreover, with a few extracurricular activities held by schools, students may have great experiences, apply some theories that they have learnt to the real life. For instance, college students live far from family, life skills such as cooking and self-confidence will be helpful since students will be able to prepare healthy meals and cope with difficulties
In conclusion, notwithstanding all the merits of only teaching students accademic knowledge offer, I believe both theoretical and practical one should be equally important and be taught at school.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-13 | hieu13092006 | 84 | view |
| 2022-02-23 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | Trangdodo | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-03 | supermanminh512 | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-03 | Nguyen Hung | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...alize their potential and strengths, As an result, they find it so efective and am...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47569444444 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84096322549 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621527777778 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.6794911669 49.4020404114 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.363636364 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3636363636 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291151695288 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104794433211 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735339552307 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18805356598 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409141749777 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.