The Graph below shows water levels in reservoirs in Australia.
The given graph illustrates the water levels in Australian reservoirs in 2009 and 2010 periods.
Overall reservoirs in City F and City C holds the highest water levels in both 2009 and 2010 years comparing to the rest, while reservoirs in City E holds the same water level over the period of two years.
Firstly, City F have 90% water level in 2009 and increased to 100% in 2010. Although City F records the highest, water levels in City C in 2009 is more than 80% and shows an increase in 2010 with 95%. Over the two years period City E water levels are stable and holding 82%. In addition, comparing to City C, E and F, all the other cities show a decrease of water levels from 2009 to 2010. Moreover, comparing to other cities, city A holds the lowest water level percentage in 2009 which is 60% and started a drop in 2010 by 15% while City D shows 80% water levels in 2009 and drastically dropped by 30% in year 2010.
- Some students found some subjects such as mathematics Philosophy are difficult so these subjects should be optional instead of compulsory To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart below gives information about billions of euros invested in four areas by various organisations 80
- In some countries criminal trials are shown on television for the public Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 88
- Describe the line graph
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A hold' or simply 'holds'?
Suggestion: A hold; Holds
...reover, comparing to other cities, city A holds the lowest water level percentage in 20...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 619, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rastically dropped by 30% in year 2010.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, moreover, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 756.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.34482758621 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2788787623 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459770114943 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1010561395 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29128421667 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189612963622 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596762616527 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254718173442 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454063417527 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.19 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.