The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries /line/ bar.
The charts compare how much global water was used by sector from 1900 to 2000 and the water consumption in Brazil and Congo in 2000.
Overall, there was an increase in the consumption of global water which was used for agriculture, industry and domestic activities. In 2000, the consumption of water in Brazil was higher than in Democratic Republic of Congo.
In the line graph, the highest figure was recorded in agriculture over a period shown, while the opposite was true for water consumption, which underwent a slight increase. In 1990, were the consumptions of agricultural water, industrial water and domestic water were almost 500km3, 200km3and 100km3 respectively. From 1900 to water increased slightly, to around 200km3. Between 1960 and 2000, the consumption of agricultural water rocketed and reached the top at the end, with approximately 3000km3. While only 1300km3 and 400km3 were the consumption of industrial water and domestic water respectively.
Looking at the table, in 2000, the population of Brazil was 176 million, while 5,2 million was the population of Congo. Water consumption in Brazil in 2000 was 359m3, which was higher than in Congo, at only 8m3. Therefore, the irrigated land in Congo accounted for 100km2, while this land in Brazil was higher 26400km2 than other in Congo.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-06 | Chang_highlight | 67 | view |
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries line bar 67
- The graph below shows Long Term International Migration in UK 1999 2008 100
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of job required 61
- Today large shopping centers and supermarkets are more common than small local shops Is this a negative or posite development 56
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ion, which underwent a slight increase. In 1990, were the consumptions of agricult...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1100.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21327014218 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82214654644 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478672985782 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2927655864 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219478629767 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11571569248 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664145063322 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162165894525 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794715471522 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.