Some people think history has little or nothing to offer, while others say the study of the past helps understand the present.
Some believe the past has slightly small amount or even zero to illuminate the present, whereas others say it is vital to know history to be able to understand the current times. Throughout this essay I will discuss both side and give my opinion on the latter view.
Supporters of the former opinion argues that events that happened in the past are irrelevant with today’s developments and events. This is because, as the essential topics of the globe are constantly changing regards to the industrial developments and previously technological breakthroughs, looking answers through the old times would not highlight today. Take an example of two men, one from the stone age and the other one from the millennium decade. The daily struggles of these two individuals are not similar, while one is trying new ways to hunt a deer, the other is facing with the modern city life problems such as air pollution.
However, examining the past times provide human beings with an advance knowledge on varied issues where human emotions and the basic necesstiy of humanity involved. The reason for that, since the begging of the times, individuals share common concerns and thoughts. Such as having a shelter, maintaining their live with good conditions, even though the definition of these topics may change depends on the age of the individuals living in it, for example having shelter ones means a good cage now this definition stands for a flat, or a house, the core of this issues will be remained the same. Therefore, understanding the past will light the new roads that humans are heading.
To conclude, although history in many levels are not relevant with what is happening now in the world, since the great number of things have already been changed. I believe that it is vital to learn the past, as human beings are still sharing many common grounds with their ancestors such as feelings and the fundamental life needs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-13 | mubeccel2020 | 89 | view |
| 2020-03-09 | mubeccel2020 | 84 | view |
- What is important to understand from the lecture is that the professor disagrees with the advantages of smart cars presented in the reading namely that smart cars will reduce the number of accidents that smart cars will reduce commuting times and that sma 73
- There s no doubt that Turtle Excluder Devices are a great idea that must be used by every single shrimping boat However they are far from perfect and in need of drastic improvement regardless of what the author in the reading may believe 78
- Some people believe that to give opportunities to the new generation companies should encourage high level employees who are older than 55 to retire Do you agree or disagree 76
- People today spent too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do Do you agree or disagree with the statement 73
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smartphones cell phones with Internet access while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch Which point of view do you think is better and why 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 557, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nds for a flat, or a house, the core of this issues will be remained the same. There...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, so, still, therefore, whereas, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96604938272 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59217185005 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.6589057983 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.083333333 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120739469159 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467736536634 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666805435018 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826253119279 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636556848655 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.