The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996.
The pie charts given below compares the US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996 on six categories and the data is calibrate in percentage. Overall at the beginning period of US spending patterns while the Food was the most significant sectors of all categories. In comparison, at the end of period cars become the largest segment and the lowest contribution made by books, petrol and furniture.
Base one first pie chart, US spending patterns in the year 1966, the largest segment was food. Food sector accounted 44% of US spending patterns from seven categories. Difference from the largest segment, cars sector as the second biggest part of the chart accounted 23% of US spending patterns, then followed by furniture it got one in ten while the computer sector made up the smallest part of the chart. It only 1 %.
And ar the beginning of period in the year 1996. Food contributed the least to the US spending patterns and sharply decrease by less than a third. In stark contrast the second highest segment extremely increase by 22%. From 23% increased to more than two fifth. And furniture sector had down by 2% and computer was the lowest contribution sector of US spending patterns in 1966 also increased to 9% while the restaurants, petrol and books sector had total 22% in the year 1966 and 23% in the year 1996.
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 63
- The two pie charts given below describe some eployment patterns in Great Britain in 1992 and the data is calibrate in percentage In general it can be seen that the biggest proportion from male was managerial and profesional and the biggest percentage of F
- The pie chart below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 67
- The three pie chart below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 60
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'calibrated'.
Suggestion: calibrated
... 1996 on six categories and the data is calibrate in percentage. Overall at the beginning...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n made by books, petrol and furniture. Base one first pie chart, US spending pa...
^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...3% increased to more than two fifth. And furniture sector had down by 2% and comp...
^^
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rants, petrol and books sector had total 22% in the year 1966 and 23% in the year...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78165938865 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60423168791 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484716157205 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 68.8308615375 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.25 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38409910714 0.215688989381 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145080859555 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14601954569 0.0843802449381 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281337934356 0.15604864568 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621825422981 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.