Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charges. To what extent is this a positive or a negative development?
The issue of copyrights in the music industry and literature has been on debate recently. The violation of music and books’ copyrights has been dominant across the globe. Despite several conveniences that the free downloading of music and books bring about, I would contend that it could have detrimental efforts on the music sector and literature in general and on artists and writers in particular.
On the one hand, undoubtedly, free-of-charge downloading ensures also unlimited access to a wide range of sources of music pieces/songs and books. This feature enables internet users to be able to download thousands, convenient for their entertainment and study. While this could save the budget of the audience significantly, it does great harm to the financial stability of singers, composers, musicians and writers. Once their copyrights are not respected, their income would reduce dramatically.
Though the free access to music and literature works on the web could make them gain more popularity among the general public, this could pose a threat of plagiarism. Some novel songs in Vietnamese have shown evidence of plagiarized sound beats from the top-hit international ones. This, in the long run, could deteriorate the creativity among young artists. In addition, the audience would feel more bored and lose their interest in enjoying new music but cling to famous masterpieces of the 60s, 70s or 80s. As a result, the proliferation of music and literature masterpieces would be unfeasible.
In conclusion, the free downloading of music and books on the internet has provided the most diverse sources of leisure and research ever. However, I am of the opinion that the governors should impose more stringent censorship on the act of downloading by the public to benefit the whole music and literature industries.
- Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charges To what extent is this a positive or a negative development 78
- Question Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charges To what extent is this a positive or a negative development 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ake them gain more popularity among the general public, this could pose a threat of plagiarism...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, in general, in particular, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31379310345 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99611520173 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565517241379 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6547797603 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.071428571 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201560589565 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696519990688 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440903999034 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123505064944 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331375139356 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.