the pie chart below shows the contribution to the Grecee's economy by industry in 2007 and 2017.
The pie chart illustrates the inputs by commerce to the Greece’s economy in 2007 and 2017. The units are in percentages.
Overall, Agriculture was the highest contributor to the Greece’s economy in 2007, while it was in the third position in 2017. Although Health care and education was the most impact in the economy in 2017, it had less relevance in 2007 set in the fourth position. It is important to highlight that Leisure and Hospitality showed the lowest contributor to the economy in 2007, whereas in 2017, manufacturing was the lowest.
According to the pie chart, Agriculture contributed to the Greece’s economy in 2007, by 24%, but its input decrease in 2007 with just 14%. Moreover, Construction and trade, utilities and transportation contributed in the same proportion in 2017, by 17%. While Construction keeps their percentage 2017, Trade, Utilities and Transportation showed a decline of 3%.On the other hand, the industries that showed a low contribution were Leisure and Hospitality in 2007 by 3%, and Manufacturing in 2017 by 8%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-03-19 | Hector Padilla | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015 73
- rembrandt painting 65
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do 60
- dinosaurs 65
- the bar chart below shows the number of girls per 100 boys enrolled in different levels of school education 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...d Transportation showed a decline of 3%.On the other hand, the industries that sho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, third, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18713450292 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15862023288 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502923976608 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8273291792 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.875 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445683204969 0.215688989381 207% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188663889903 0.103423049105 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108577058971 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312273729961 0.15604864568 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700031000375 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.