Enviroment
The author of the reading believes that let it burn policy in situation like Yellowstone national park was a negative point, the , however, finds this idea dubious and casts doubt on the reasons proposed by the reading passage.
First of all, the author argues that the let it burn policy in Yellowstone turned the park to the devastated wasteland because it burnt for more than two months and spread over a huge area and caused a large scale of damage to trees and green life . Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that it helped the vegetation by colonizing new plants and growing some certain plants because some small plants need open space for themselves and their seeds.
Secondly, the reading passage holds the view that the policy had bad effects on wildlife because many animals were unable to scape and it caused a destruction in the food chain. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that animal population recovered and the park turned into a ideal habitat for some animals like rabbits and certain food chain got stronger.
Finally, it is stated in the article that tourist attraction was effected as well as the rest of things and in result the local economy and local business got into problems and tourism season cut short. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that the chaos did not happened every year and that was only for one time so in this case the tourists came back next year and each year after that.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The author of the reading believes that let it burn...
^^
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
...one national park was a negative point, the , however, finds this idea dubious and ca...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... national park was a negative point, the , however, finds this idea dubious and ca...
^^
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... scale of damage to trees and green life . Conversely, the lecturer brings up the ...
^^
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tion recovered and the park turned into a ideal habitat for some animals like rab...
^
Line 4, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ess got into problems and tourism season cut short. In contrast, the speaker dism...
^^
Line 4, column 289, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'happen'
Suggestion: happen
... due to the fact that the chaos did not happened every year and that was only for one ti...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, in contrast, as well as, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1214.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72373540856 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29467745883 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591439688716 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 21.2450331126 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 21.9442707878 49.2860985944 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 173.428571429 110.228320801 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.7142857143 21.698381199 169% => OK
Discourse Markers: 17.5714285714 7.06452816374 249% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.3589403974 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.0289183223 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.498013245 156% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.