Green tea has long been hailed as an excellent source of antioxidants, powerful anti-aging and immune-system boosting compounds. Many people therefore believe that the more cups they consume each day, the greater the benefits. Green tea, however, contains moderate amounts of caffeine, a stimulant that is not without side effects, including sleeplessness, irritability, and headaches. A long-term study has found that those who drink more than three cups of green tea a day are likely to have symptoms similar to those that chronic coffee drinkers, another source of caffeine, suffer. Therefore, it is important that anyone who chooses to drink green tea limit their intake to no more than two cups a day.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The argument states that green tea drinkers should have no more than two cups a day, as a long term study posits that people who have three or more cups in a day can suffer from symptoms that habitual coffee drinkers face. The validity of the argument can only be evaluated if the following evidences are provided.
Firstly, the argument needs to elucidate on the reliability of the study, which puts a upper cap on the number of cups of tea a person should drink in a day. It is possible that the study took into consideration only people above 60 years of age. For people so old, their body cannot handle even small amount of caffeine. Further, the study may have only had a very small number of test cases over a long period of time. Having a small number of test cases will not allow any study to make a generalization regarding the drinking of tea. If either of the above cases are true, then the validity of the argument is called into question.
Secondly, the argument needs to address on how much caffiene is too much for the body. The argument unwarrantly assumes that issues arrising due to the amount of caffeine in three cups of tea is similar to the issues arrising due to the amount of caffeine consumed by chronic coffee drinkers. It is possible that issues caused due to caffeine intake are due to high concentrations of caffeine rather than the quantity of caffiene intake, and since tea has a lesser concentration of caffeine, tea thus would not cause caffeine related issues simliar to that caused by chronic drinking of coffee.
Another point the argument needs to elaborate on is whether the disadvantages of drinking multiple cups of tea a day outweigh the advantages offered by doing so. It is possible that all the beneficiary effects of drinking green tea (being an excellent source of antioxidants, powerful anti-aging and immune-system boosting compounds) are essential for the human body and cannot be obtained from other sources. In such a case the argument that one should not drink multiple cups of tea a day stands weakened.
In conclusion the argument as it stands is severly flawed due to its dependance on several unwarranted assumptions. The validity of the argument can only be evaluated if the argument can further elucidate on the points mentioned above in the form of a systematic research study.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | jayauen | 70 | view |
| 2022-07-07 | sag15 | 53 | view |
| 2022-04-09 | harvey_elliot | 62 | view |
| 2021-09-27 | Bolaji | 45 | view |
| 2021-09-22 | megha tomar | 73 | view |
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 53
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won t benefit their future careers Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree 83
- Recent incursions by deep sea fishermen into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population With the breeding season fast approaching the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase Nonetheless the po 50
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 70
- Those who see their ideas through regardless of doubts or criticism others may express are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reas 75
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 406 350
No. of Characters: 1899 1500
No. of Different Words: 183 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.489 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.677 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.631 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 137 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 96 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 79 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 29 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.375 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.565 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.688 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.372 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.6 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.107 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...he reliability of the study, which puts a upper cap on the number of cups of tea ...
^
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... small number of test cases over a long period of time. Having a small number of test cases wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...ases over a long period of time. Having a small number of test cases will not allow any study to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 28.8173652695 52% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 55.5748502994 112% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1941.0 2260.96107784 86% => OK
No of words: 406.0 441.139720559 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78078817734 5.12650576532 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67346237175 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 204.123752495 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467980295567 0.468620217663 100% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 705.55239521 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.0948526671 57.8364921388 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.3125 119.503703932 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 23.324526521 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 5.70786347227 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199458520485 0.218282227539 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062320649789 0.0743258471296 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072461640894 0.0701772020484 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113375007321 0.128457276422 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906038490658 0.0628817314937 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.3799401198 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.3550499002 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.5979740519 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.32208582834 95% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 98.500998004 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.