The charts below give information ow the satisfaction levels wit ahe cdrcation system in fore afferent counries from 1990 to 2010. Summarise the inforwation by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
The line chart provides data on how satisfied people in five countries were with the education system over a twenty-vear period, starting in 1990.
Overall it can be seen that satisfaction levels with the education system in Japan, Germany and Brazil increased, whereas they decreased in the USA and Australia. Further, satisfaction levels in Japan were consistently the highest over the entire period.
Looking at the data sets that increased in more detail, it can be seen that the percentage of people who were satistied with the education system in Japan stood at about 56% in 1990. This figure increased to 69% in 2010, which was the highest value on the chart. Levels of satisfaction with the schooling system in Germany and Brazil showed a similar trend, rising from 34% and 15% to 5O% and 4%, respectively. Satisfaction levels in Brazil therefore showed the greatest increase of al the countries over the period shown.
Turning to the data sets that showed a decrease over the period, it is evident that the percentage of people who were satisfied with the education system in Australia was approximately SON in 1990. They rose briefly to 59% in 1995, and then dropped to 42% in 2010. Similarly, levels of satisfaction in the USA fell from 45% in 1990 to 39% in 2010, which was the greatest decrease of all the categories.
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A B and C over four different seasons Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A B and C over four different seasons Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The diagram below illustrates how glass is recycled Summarie the information by selecting and reporting the main features and mak Connlparills whiere relevant
- The diagram below illustrates how glass is recycled Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 46
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, look, similarly, so, then, therefore, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1113.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90308370044 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71308421223 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471365638767 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6624531203 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.3 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148949770803 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702680119904 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304073882573 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10108403545 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204086060078 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.