Nowadays, many families have both parents working. Some working parents believe that other family members can take care of their children, while others think childcare centers are better. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Parenting of children, by whom must be done for their overall development, has really become a matter of discussion among intellectuals. Few ratio of employed mother and father asserts that their adolescents can be looked out by the rest of their family members, whilst others opine that day-care is the perfect option. Both ideologies seem to be worth consideration; however, my inclination falls toward the latter notion. This essay will shed light on the given two views along with my opinion, which is highlighted below.
To begin with, the proponents of the former statement base their viewpoint on the fact that love and care of the family members for their children cannot be achieved from the private centres. To be more precise, grandparents, who are more experienced in taking care as they have raised their own offsprings, are generally close to their grandchildren's, due to which they are familiar with the likes and dislikes of their children and give assistance according to the need. As a result, they could provide better care and knowledge be it cultural or traditional norms.
On the flip side, childcare institutions are preferred by many to be far more superior, owing to the certainty that teachers, who are employed in these centres are more experienced for the well-being of the teenagers. To illustrate, if there is any kind of mishap occurs such as physical injury, even wasting a single minute, they can offer the first-aid to the children. In addition, since youngsters over there would meet their peers, which would not increase their verbal communication, but also engage themselves in the games. Consequently, it would lead the path for their holistic growth, which on the contrast cannot be attained at homes otherwise.
In the gist of above content, I reiterate that although family members are more known to their children, yet in my perspective I believe that the prompt response in dealing with the different situations can only be attained in childcare organisations in terms of any physiological damage or making them independent.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-05-29 | baymiengdat | 84 | view |
- Every country has poor people and every country has different ways of dealing with the poor What are some of the reasons for world poverty How can the poor be helped Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge o 89
- Nowadays many families have both parents working Some working parents believe that other family members can take care of their children while others think childcare centers are better Discuss both views and give your opinion 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun ratio seems to be countable; consider using: 'Few ratios'.
Suggestion: Few ratios
...tter of discussion among intellectuals. Few ratio of employed mother and father asserts t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, look, really, so, well, in addition, kind of, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1449704142 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89712656264 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603550295858 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.5616488023 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.916666667 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220428483532 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738616765553 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441062098733 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130922310425 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472513923948 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.