The internet is viewed as an excellent means of communication but some people suggest that it may not the best place to find information
Recently, the means of finding out the detailed information and making conversations has become an ongoing topic of debate in many parts of the world. It is a common belief that the Internet plays an indispensable role in the process of bonding people, which cannot be supplanted by any other kind. Besides, there are some shortcomings when the Internet is used to find out detailed information. I strongly incline with both arguments for several reasons.
On the one hand, in the Internet age, using wireless networks can contribute a decline to the distance barrier by some social media and broaden one’s social circle, even making overseas new friends. Specifically, in terms of extroverted teenagers, they can feel more at ease when having more friends, eventually from abroad. For example, there is no need to set aside time to organize face-to-face meetings, they just add friends on social media and create conversations. According to the Close-knit Bonds Club, the majority of adolescents tend to deem the visual world as the basic needs to exchange some projects at schools and catch up on gossips with friends
On the other hand, it is argued that being proficient at looking for detail on the Internet can be considered as career progression as well as future prosperity in the competitive world. Conversely, the key consideration is the accurate level of the materials, which can be learned from real experiences. It fosters following the truth and the greatest solutions when facing the arduous cases on a daily basis which were related to professional knowledge. In chemical experiments, the rates between some solutions seemed not the same as in the theories. People have to be flexible in changing the proportions to display the most noticeable phenomenon. According to the Oxford survey, approximately 87% of citizens place more importance on correct materials than they do on the sources, which the fake and truth are mixed. These people can further their career paths and achieve the coveted awards in late life.
To sum up, while it is apparent that the Internet is one way by which users can get endless sources, it is undeniable that the accurate level of information is given more stress. Some striking downfall from the Internet like gossip magazines should be substituted by the truth from the real application. In addition, Internet users can overcome distance obstacles and satisfy the social circle requirements effectually.
- The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia present and in future 84
- The chart shows the information about salt intake in the US in 2000
- The graph below gives information about how much people in the United States and the United Kingdom spend on petrol Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 91
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in the world and in different continents 84
- Some people feel that certain workers like nurses doctors and teachers should be paid more while many people think that other people like film actors or singers should be paid huge sums of money due to the importance of the work that they do and their rol 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, conversely, if, look, so, well, while, for example, in addition, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2061.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16541353383 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87569057732 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576441102757 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.2398578596 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.235294118 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4705882353 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152233556567 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474888243237 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045176346493 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975308330243 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556975558271 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.