Big salary is more important than job satisfaction. Do you agree or disagree?
"Pursuit of passion" is an inspirational phrase that is recognizable to the majority of the young generation. However, is this statement suitable for everyone? Is everyone willing to leave everything behind to pursue their desired career or willing to work for a high-paying job that does not inspire them? From my perspective, I admit that it would be higher to have an appointment with an excessive salary, although it is not precisely as expected.
Firstly, it is conspicuous that having a desirable income leads to financial freedom, which means humans can gain mastery of their personal lives. Wage is a crucial factor for people to meet their basic needs. In detail, money is demanded to pay for taxes, food, bills, healthcare, and also education. The majority consider it a priority to have a tolerable high-quality of life. According to the recent survey that questioned 3,194 workers of the Klang Valley occurred by Jobs Central Malaysia, about 26,5% of respondents ranked wage as the most critical element to attain pleasure in the workplace. For instance, high salaries help to obtain high-quality lives, including adequate nutrition, health care, and the capability to pay for long-term travel to expand knowledge. I support that when people achieve satisfaction from frame to soul, they will succeed in managing their lives.
Besides, when humans can meet the elementary needs, desires in other fields such as spiritual fulfillment will be taken into consideration. More specifically, spiritual life is a source of endogenous strength that contributes to the quality and ambitions of life. However, it is impossible to reach a state of satisfaction in prosperity while obliged to face financial pressure. When money is no longer a problem, tensions at the workplace will become motivations for people to ameliorate skills and knowledge. In fact, in a comfortable vibe, people tend to recline. Stressful moments, being "squeezed" with a moderate level, can stimulate people to work, think, be creative, even surpass their limits. As a result, they can explore undiscovered abilities, deepen their spirits. Thus, it can be seen that with financial freedom, employees have more opportunities to develop many other aspects and complete themselves. More specifically, the mass of large-scale institutions such as Google composes a demanding working environment. Still, the wage is admirable, and the workplace is well-equipped with modern facilities. These companies want to harness the full potential of their employees.
In brief, individuals have personal conceptions of their choices due to their living environment. It is impossible to force any point of view on everyone. However, there is no denying that stable financial conditions bring many physical and mental benefits to employees. High-paying jobs are not only an attractive source of profits but also an opportunity to develop themselves in the profession that workers are currently working on.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-27 | bassmodulators123 | 56 | view |
| 2024-04-05 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 11 | view |
| 2024-04-05 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 11 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | Molla Md Rezaul Karim | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-03 | TLan168 | 11 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hough it is not precisely as expected. Firstly, it is conspicuous that having a...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will succeed in managing their lives. Besides, when humans can meet the elemen...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he full potential of their employees. In brief, individuals have personal conc...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, thus, well, while, for instance, in brief, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2535.0 1615.20841683 157% => OK
No of words: 463.0 315.596192385 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47516198704 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1514491755 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 176.041082164 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576673866091 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 790.2 506.74238477 156% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5617361299 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8076923077 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0552088114892 0.244688304435 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0136117999872 0.084324248473 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0190143859703 0.0667982634062 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0318100100957 0.151304729494 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0114441084663 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 149.0 78.4519038076 190% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.