The internet is a great course of information and has opened up opportunities for people to learn all over the world Is all the information reliable on the internet What could be done to control information online

Essay topics:

The internet is a great course of information and has opened up opportunities for people to learn all over the world. Is all the information reliable on the internet? What could be done to control information online?

The internet has let us ultimate access to information around the world. However, all of them might not be truly valid, there could be some steps to address this issue.

Firstly, it should be considered that the internet is an open platform for sharing data with no specific monitor by any authority. So it is probable to have some invalid contents, no matter inadvertently or deliberately they have been put on. For example, during the pandemic disease in 2020, it was suggested to use a hairdryer in front of the nose as a way to prevent Coronavirus by some Youtube bloggers which turn out to be false soon after.

Secondly, there is a contentious debate about whether posts should be monitored or not. On the one hand, it is against liberty and freedom, on the other hand, it might endanger one’s life or healthiness. As an initial solution user should be taught to evaluate the creditability of information by means of critical thinking ability which could be developed by teachers at an early age. On a superior level, there should be some control by social network providers take Facebook as an example which eliminated false contents related to health and safety. And finally, users should know they could trust trustworthy websites such as news broadcasters which have mechanisms for a reliability check.

In conclusion, it is likely to face misinformation on the internet. Consequently, it is the consumer’s responsibility to make sure about the validity moreover, Social platform owners should set some strict policies in order to protect their validity.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-04-08 vahidk91 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ght endanger one’s life or healthiness. As an initial solution user should be taug...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04615384615 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91670357824 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634615384615 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8985573036 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.333333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193137883696 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702528946829 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654367400562 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120671029812 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082531054705 0.056905535591 145% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.