Some people said that the internet provide people with a lot of valuable information. Others things access to so much information create problems, which view you agree with?
Many people have different beliefs about what kind of information it is available on the internet. In my opinion, I agree with the statement that the network has tones of trash information, and when someone wants to search on, it is rough. I feel this way for to main reasons, which I develop in the following paragraphs.
I begin with, people who want to look for some subject or topic, they use a browser that they throughout a lot of different possible about that subject. That information is more extensive, and the public does not know where they should start. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. More specifically, when I am looking for a specific topic, that searching on the browser is becoming so hard because if you do not write down correctly that you are looking for the browser, give you so many alternatives about it. For example, I am a veterinarian, and I want to know about calving in cows, but if you look for simply calving coming up a lot of different species. In other words, you have to spend time thinking first what do you want to look for, and after starting to use the browser.
Secondly, people think the internet is the best place because information super fast than if you have to go to a library and check on the same books. They believe this alternative is a waste of time. Drawing on my own experience, I prefer to spend time going to the library instead of waste my time on the internet. Libraries offer you not only a lot of different books, but also people working there are prepared to help you with the research. For instance, my kid needed to do homework for the school about alligators, and when I went to the local library, the employee on the library gave me various books about alligators. Besides, I did not spend time looking for reliable information on the internet. Instead, I archived the most better material at the library.
In conclusion, for those two reasons that I mentioned above, I firmly believe that use the internet to use for research it is the worse alternative that we can choose.
- parents in the past had more influence in children s education 76
- Every generation of people is different in important ways How is your generation different from your parent s generation Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer 76
- fewer cars in the future 70
- Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is specific to these online encyclopedias, 80
- It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 732, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'most') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...n the internet. Instead, I archived the most better material at the library. In conclusi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58947368421 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64462031689 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502631578947 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8573286186 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.588235294 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3529411765 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05882352941 5.45110844103 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195771303024 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679592717704 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614121620713 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11948385158 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05886958451 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.