As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The need for cutting edge technologies is on a rise in the past decade. This technological boom has had a mixture of effects on humans. According to the given prompt, as technology is improving the human reliance on it is also proportionally increasing. In my opinion, I mostly disagree with the fact has the technology has negative effects on the thinking skills of humans.
First of all, due to the advancement of technology the humans are becoming lethargic, both physically and mentally. For instance, the introduction of smartphones might have solved many problems for humans by integrating many services in a single device. However, they have also drastically reduced the amounts of energy and skills used by the people before smartphones were invented. The smartphones not only hampers the thinking skills of humans but also depreciates the relationships with their loved ones. Thus, technology does have a deteriorating effect on the human, not only in the thought process but also as an overall human being.
However, in some instances technology can also improvise humans in certain aspects. One of the main aspect is creativity. Humans tend to become more creative with the advancement of technology. They try to find different ways to solve a problem and this is mainly possible because of technological improvements. For example, an artist can now use different art tools to enhance their artistic skills with the help of different software that is related to art. This helps the artist with many more options to explore and create different forms of art which were not possible a few years ago. So, it is possible to say that creative skills are surely developed to a higher level with the advancement of technology.
In conclusion, every new technology has both positive and negative effects on humans. It is us who created these technologies and we should know how to utilize them to our best and for our own development and growth.
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be su 50
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner Over the past two years the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically Many Central Pl 50
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 50
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complain 78
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'instances'' or 'instance's'?
Suggestion: instances'; instance's
...overall human being. However, in some instances technology can also improvise humans in...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 323.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04953560372 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93152073173 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532507739938 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8363851119 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.6111111111 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9444444444 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206879816859 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639974068162 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353548628957 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113355329252 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388557579358 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.