The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicines. Government funding should reflect this.
In many parts of the world today, more folks have fretted about health. It is hypothesised that people will probably obtain more sabotages if they sustain curing diseases in lieu of avoiding. This essay attempts to point out that this statement is convincible.
There have been numerous folks who are in favor of the idea. First and foremost, global dwellers in all probability utilise more money if they go for treatments rather than preventions. It is fathomed that folks are reluctantly entailed some extra fees which relate to medicines, advice from doctors, facilities of treatments and the like. In lieu of meeting these demands, folks merely reinforce their own immune systems due to gaining some supplements which deems to be beneficial. Indeed, folks in these days have striven their best to vanish risks of illnesses in virtue of the fact they have adequate awareness of the deleterious impacts of these issues. As a bonus, citizens will probably endure some unexpected impacts which may be detrimental for their health. From this point, it is reluctant for people to pay more in sicknesses which are triggered by the treatments. As highlight for this point, according to studies of some scientific institutes in Vietnam, people have compulsorily tackled with obstacles which relate to their cardiovascular diseases after experiencing some surgery. Another possibility is that folks would perceive uncomfortable if they suffer from sicknesses. It is assumed that sensations of folks who need to endure the treatments may be worse, so they can neglect their incentives due to those cognition. Apart from that, in lieu of thriving revenues, folks will have more scope to stay in superfluous circumstances. For instance, following some CNN athletes, in Vietnam, the incomes of various workers from enterprises have been restricted due to the fact that they do not have sufficient health to sustain their works.
In brief, the aforementioned tactic are beneficial by some elements. Therefore, the tenets of this suggestion ought to be seriously implemented.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-23 | DIEU PHUONG | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-14 | lamtrann | 56 | view |
- A government has a responsibility to its citizens to ensure their safety Therefore some people think that government should increase spending on defense but spend less on social benefits To what extent you agree 11
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages 56
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 56
- The table below shows the cinema viewing figures for films by country in millions Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicines Government funding should reflect this 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1323, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this cognition' or 'those cognitions'?
Suggestion: this cognition; those cognitions
...hey can neglect their incentives due to those cognition. Apart from that, in lieu of thriving r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, therefore, well, apart from, for instance, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2987804878 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90345724095 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551829268293 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2471171831 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.235294118 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2941176471 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110923058612 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411293302927 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347250435829 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083713749489 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375351203455 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.