some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In the age of industrialization and modernization, opinions have diverged on whether or not people feel overwhelmed when faced with excessive number of options. Notwithstanding, it is my belief that the tools created to cater to human life are justified, especially technology and the Internet.
There are bounded to be those who believe that the Internet has many negative effects on human life with its global coverage. Rampant information on the Internet is not censored, which can lead to confusion and news crisis. In addition, children - a vulnerable subject, unconsciously receive malicious information, leading to deviations in both awareness and behavior. This argument is partly true, but the popularity of the network brings more benefits, including valuable knowledge that is not easily learned in real life. If we know how to select, read and receive information in a smart way, these aforementioned problems will not appear. Adults can also guide children to accessing useful and age-appropriate channels or website, forming fundamental thinking for them.
With the purpose of providing human comfort, intelligent tools are invented by modern technology, and increasingly affirmed their importance in everyday life. Using smart devices such as air conditioners, air purifiers or humidifiers enhances health and quality of life, making living or working easier and more comfortable. Besides, people would be avoid wasting unnecessary or effort on housework, focusing more on useful activities. For example, instead of fiddling with the pile os dishes, we can leave the washing machine working and read a rewarding book.
For the foregoing discussions, I would reiterate that we cannot deny the role of the Internet and technology in modern life. The more common they are, the easier life becomes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...odernization, opinions have diverged on whether or not people feel overwhelmed when faced with...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ially technology and the Internet. There are bounded to be those who believ...
^^^
Line 2, column 581, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a smart way" with adverb for "smart"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...to select, read and receive information in a smart way, these aforementioned problems will not...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 781, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng fundamental thinking for them. With the purpose of providing human comf...
^^^
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...working and read a rewarding book. For the foregoing discussions, I would r...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, for example, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56989247312 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10724753518 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652329749104 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0700245361 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35714285714 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0963633897008 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0302747320574 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340071171641 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.055567677722 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177915009248 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.