Do you agree that people should always participate in the activities that they are good at or talented in?
Self-actualization is one of the controversial issues nowadays, since competition plays a crucial role in the modern era. People strive to flourish their talents in the competitive world and try to be perfect in aspects of life, such as education and career. Two main ideas related to this topic are versus each other. Some people believe that versatility is the essential factor for being a winner. People have to adapt to various fields, including not only the areas which are related to them, but also irrelevant fields. On the contrary, some others believe that people must discover their talent and move forward in one area, which is the most convenient for them. I support the idea that flourishing talent is the most crucial solution and vindicate my viewpoint for two reasons.
The first crucial reason is that people inherit most of the abilities and intelligence from their biological parents, and the genetics effect is inevitable in determining one’s aptitudes. In a research conducted by Tehran University, nearly 80 percent of the students studying in engineering fields had at least one member in their family who majored in engineering or mathematical sciences. The environmental factors, however, can either exacerbate or consolidate the genetics effect and cannot take its place unless with an indefatigable endeavor that ordinary people rarely have in the society. So flourishing talents and being distinguished as a top candidate in job interviews requires natural abilities, and effort is a secondary factor in such an issue since talent overtakes efforts.
The other noteworthy reason that should not be underestimated is that, usually, endeavoring fields that are not inclined to one’s talents causes depression and anxiety. University students who suffer depression and disorders are those who have not chosen their major according to their abilities. Usually, they can not meet the expectations that society or parents require, for they have not selected a suitable direction in life. Students in high school should be careful about their future and not get deceived by the majors that are more popular in the community. Since they have to try hard, and an ideal job is not guaranteed for them. So because of their self-confidence, they should choose the best major according to their talents.
To make the whole discussion concise, talent plays an essential role in life and career since genetics is dominant in comparison to environmental factors and the essentiality of self-confidence and equilibrium in life. Following abilities is highly recommended for an experience with glorious achievements, and these achievements can make one ambitious for other goals.
- Do you agree that people should always participate in the activities that they are good at or talented in 78
- Do you agree that people should always participate in the activities that they are good at or talented in 78
- Do you agree that people should always participate in the activities that they are good at or talented in 76
- Do you agree that people should always participate in the activities that they are good at or talented in 71
- Students of a university have a long break between university semesters the university requires all students to do one of the following for one month during the break 1 Students must take a course on the subject that has no direct connection to their majo 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, at least, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2280.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36470588235 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01378057536 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536470588235 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 726.3 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9821140201 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3684210526 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05263157895 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128494431154 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420874397911 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279223027038 0.0737576698707 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0745948016697 0.150856017488 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324947029592 0.0645574589148 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 86.8835125448 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.