The table demonstrates the number of five different kinds of vehicles that had licenses in Australia in three years 2010 2012 and 2014

Essay topics:

The table demonstrates the number of five different kinds of vehicles that had licenses in Australia in three years: 2010, 2012, and 2014.

The table demonstrates the number of five different kinds of vehicles that had licenses in Australia in three years: 2010, 2012, and 2014.

Overall, there was an increase in all types of road transports from 2010 to 2014. In particular, motorcycles witnessed the primary growth, while the lowest rise belonged to heavy trucks.

In 2010, passenger vehicles took the first rank with 11,800,000 units, followed by the runner-up - commercial transports with 2,300,000 units. The lowest figures in the same year were accounted for by trucks with 384,000 units for the heavy type and 106,000 units for the light one. Four years later, although the number of vehicles registered by travelers slightly increased by 10.2%, equivalent to 13,000,000 units, it still held the first position in Australia. Despite the moderate rise of light trucks (23.5%), heavy trucks experience the lowest variation, with only 8.3%. By contrast, there was a significant increase in motorcycles from 540,000 units in 2010 to 709,000 units in 2014, which means this type of transport led the upward trend (30.8%) among others during the given period.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-04-15 truc.bey2008 89 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, still, while, in particular

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27374301676 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57207222985 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625698324022 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8089185987 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273087154435 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151364256258 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.276777328586 0.0843802449381 328% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.341737139937 0.15604864568 219% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.378238888002 0.0819641961636 461% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.