Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is said that the right thought is to admit a negative condition, such as unhappiness in working and inadequate income, while others assume that the effort of improvement for something like that ought to do. I believe that such drawbacks should be improved with positive views to face them.
On the one hand, it is claimed that going ahead with disadvantages is normally accepted. Because of interfering of outside things in the life such as the differently fundamental conditions, that may not be change. For instance, those who were born in poor families, they will not have as various opportunities for entering higher education and seeking satisfied job as those in the rich. Moreover, the improvement of negative situations will take much time and significantly effort, let alone not to making sure that is either successful transformation or worse one. For example, if someone wants to earn more money and they can spend their savings to invest for making more profits, in contrast, they can also get lost completely.
On the other hand, the improvement of negative issues should take into consideration seriously and so does my point. Firstly, we can not know those coming into us, but we can change the way we face them with optimistic points of views. Only by having sufficient trust about positive changing passion, we will have approximately 50% of success. Secondly, making an effort and action of enhancing personal situations helps us obtain a lifelong goal as well as a bright future. Consequently, we will have deserved a glory for all continuous effort on the date we will be unexpected.
In conclusion, accepting drawbacks does have some right reasons for someone, but it seems to me that resolution of improving them makes us better in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-09 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
| 2024-01-23 | hau le | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 56 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 56 | view |
- Passenger railway journeys Great Britain between 1950 and 2004 5
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004 5 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 592, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...n or worse one. For example, if someone want to earn more money and they can spend t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ort on the date we will be unexpected. In conclusion, accepting drawbacks does ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03728813559 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86469760834 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606779661017 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9368564031 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.307692308 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.4615384615 7.06120827912 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125457627649 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468545751908 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457520109396 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0878080910211 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426624823974 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.