Computers and the Internet help to make school assignments faster and easier to complete. Do you agree or disagree with the statement?
It is no doubt that the Internet is so far one of the greatest inventions of all time. Some people reckon that computers and the internet help students increase the speed and the accuracy of their doing homework while others do not think the same. From my point of view, I do agree that the benefits of computers can outweight the drawbacks.
Integrating technology into classroom learning can be a great teaching method to increase the study efficiency of learners and make school assignments faster and easier. The first and foremost merit that can be mentioned is that the Internet can save time. Thanks to the technology revolution, students nowadays are allowed to access a multitude of online classes, which provide online homework. In the past, when teachers still applied the traditional way of teaching into classes, students had to do the assignment on paper and give it to teachers in person. Nowadays, instead of doing that, students can easily do the task and submit it right away on the website, which is a time-saving form. Secondly, the Internet is regarded as a part and parcel tool in the acquiring knowledge process due to its variety of information. Whenever learners have to search for knowledge in their study, the Internet is the most common choice. There are plenty of websites that contain the same field and learners can easily find out what they need.
No matter how awesome the online network is, there are still some discourage the use of it because of these reasons. Initially, people think that the adoption of new technology can lead to a lack of face-to-face interaction. That students do not meet their guide for a long time may cause idleness on finishing homework and as a result, the Internet becomes counterproductive. In addition, not every data on the Internet is reliable. Besides some websites that provide learners with useful knowledge, there are still some with imprecise information. They cannot point out which is the accurate one and which is not; therefore, the confusion may follow.
To conclude, everything has its two sides, including computers and the Internet. From my own perspective, I still believe that they bring more benefits than drawbacks to students’ study.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-19 | Canary Dang | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, in addition, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1864.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03783783784 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75680975042 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52972972973 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0688038337 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1052631579 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4736842105 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202941531442 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562439558117 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545068165298 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118027636443 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577211558348 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.