A university education is necessary to succeed in a career, to what extent to you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of higher education is essential to triumph in suitable jobs and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although I and many believe the matter of advanced educational degree is highly beneficial and such issue is regarded as thoroughly constructive by a substantial number of individuals. But some opposers are inclined to consider that possessing innate talent can be a plus, so I will analyze that throughout this essay.
Within the realm of science, going to college has an integral role to have a prosperous career and it can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of knowledgeable and qualified workers who understand complex and required subjects are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I discovered universities' training can open up unexpected opportunities. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both giving work-related skills and thinking analytically apparently can be seen.
However, some opponents believe that postgraduate studies do not necessarily lead to the booming occupation. They think having abundant experience might increase the consequences of being victorious. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of upbringing natural aptitude could relate to this reality that the demerits of unsuccessful educated employees arising from shallow and unpractical learning. As a tangible example, Bill Gates who established Microsoft dropped out of Harvard University and now he is one of the richest people in the world.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of pursuing high-level education can increase the possibility of profitable careers far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of interacting with people with professional backgrounds prove the significance of enhancing students' skills like teamwork and problem solving, but also pinpoint boosting self-confidence implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-29 | honorrr | 88 | view |
| 2020-08-25 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-08-19 | Alireza.r.m | 85 | view |
| 2020-06-29 | Gohar Khan | 76 | view |
| 2020-06-04 | baharehsiami | 88 | view |
- Business whether big or small is to maximize profit Do you agree with that Give your opinion 88
- Exams are commonly used in most schools and universities Some people think exams should be replaced by other forms of assessment Do you agree or disagree 88
- If Voting is compulsory in a democratic society what conclusions can we draw about Nature of democracy 85
- As national services which one deserve to receive more financial support education or health 88
- People should take part in sports either in individual or in teams because people can learn many useful skills How far do you agree Explain and use examples or your own experience 88
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77591973244 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.285819991 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 139.433497537 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.692307692308 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 379.143842365 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2787670437 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.916666667 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0910913034569 0.242375264174 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.02886570273 0.0925447433944 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280575562085 0.071462118173 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0504654529554 0.151781067708 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00579946789682 0.0609392437508 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 12.6369458128 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.48 8.32886699507 138% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 55.0591133005 229% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77591973244 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.285819991 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 139.433497537 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.692307692308 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 379.143842365 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2787670437 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.916666667 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0910913034569 0.242375264174 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.02886570273 0.0925447433944 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280575562085 0.071462118173 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0504654529554 0.151781067708 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00579946789682 0.0609392437508 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 12.6369458128 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.48 8.32886699507 138% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 55.0591133005 229% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.