Some people believe that it is good for students to have the same teacher for several years. Others think students benefit more from having new teachers each year. Which do you think is better? Give specific reasons to support your opinion.
It is thought remaining the teachers for many years is beneficial for students, while some believe it is better to have different teachers every year. Personally, I think changing teachers is the proper route for students' development.
The same schoolteachers for specific classes bring about a variety of drawbacks. Firstly, the similar method to expose to lessons might cause boredom and fatigue. For example, if monotonous one-way delivery of information is the teachers' style, students are only bombarded with knowledge and fail to absorb them. Secondly, the inconfidence of some may result from the same arrangement of teachers. There are lots of teachers with fixed assumptions about each student and only pay more attention to the high-flyers while the others are regarded as the lower-level group. With this unchanged situation for a long time, students are prone to suffer from stress and anxiety and lose the competitve spirit. In the long run, they have difficulty keeping up with the lectures.
In my opinion, educational institutions should let different educators take the responsibility at school. Obviously, the different styles from various teachers brings the feelings of joys and freshness to the atmosphere. Students have plenty of opportunities to learn from one-way to two-way communication or play-centred approach. Each style might be suitable for different students, therefore, there is nobody falling behind with studies for too long. Besides, this kind of arrangement contributes to enhance the sense of adaptability for both. For teachers, it is essential to tailor their teaching method to encounter various classes. For students, they are likely to develop their communication skills and the ability to get used to the new method, which are dispensable in the working environment later in life.
In conclusion, I strongly agree with the idea of arranging various teachers since it has several perks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-15 | Agteg | 56 | view |
| 2020-12-31 | christy018 | 56 | view |
| 2020-07-23 | emoooo1000 | 67 | view |
| 2020-06-25 | Yuuki Akiko | 56 | view |
| 2020-04-24 | chichi291 | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97390689535 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593333333333 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2708048287 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8823529412 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6470588235 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11764705882 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368034909937 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102569189786 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820103368784 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223164367506 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128456822183 0.056905535591 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.