Some people believe that it is good for students to have the same teacher for several years. Others think students benefit more from having new teachers each year. Which do you think is better? Give specific reasons to support your opinion.
There is no doubt that teachers play an indispensable role in education. However, some people suppose that students should be taught by the same teachers for years. Contrary to this, other people believe that it is more beneficial for students to have new teachers each year. I think that the same teachers for many years is much more effective than new ones each year. On one hand, it seems to take a long time for teachers to be able to understand profoundly their students' abilities. As a result, the same teachers for years could design, organize assignments, rules, and effective ways or methods for each peculiar student. What's more, it also helps classes' atmosphere to be far more cozy and familiar. This leads to well-connection and closer relationships between teachers and students. It will eliminate the gaps between them, which also helps teachers feel more free and easy to share and teach students a great number of other skills besides study such as social skills, transferable and interpersonal skills.
On the other hand, some tend to believe that new teachers each year do good to students and their performances. it seem to considered as a good way of bringing news things for both students and teachers to explore. This is of the essence when some students have to struggle with their old learning methods but cannot improve.
In conclusion, I strongly have a belief that the same teachers for successive years are advised to apply on a large scale to enhance the quality of education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-15 | Agteg | 56 | view |
| 2020-12-31 | christy018 | 56 | view |
| 2020-07-23 | emoooo1000 | 67 | view |
| 2020-06-25 | Yuuki Akiko | 56 | view |
| 2020-04-24 | chichi291 | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 67
- Should governments spend so much money on space exploration when there are problems on Earth that need to be solved 56
- It is neither possible nor useful to provide university places for a high proportion of young people To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You shou
- Some high schools have a requirement that students must complete a certain amount of volunteer work in order to graduate What do you think about this type of requirement Give details to support your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 629, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...s or methods for each peculiar student. Whats more, it also helps classes atmosphere ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 112, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ood to students and their performances. it seem to considered as a good way of bri...
^^
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seems'?
Suggestion: seems
... to students and their performances. it seem to considered as a good way of bringing...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, so, well, i think, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1253.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9137254902 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69301858451 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556862745098 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2102510446 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3846153846 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.520733078355 0.244688304435 213% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.199264428186 0.084324248473 236% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131714908408 0.0667982634062 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.335957121074 0.151304729494 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103627689741 0.056905535591 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.