Historical monuments and museums are visited only by the tourists, locals do not visit them. Why is this is happening? What are the solutions to prevent this?
Places of traditional significance and museums, while often visited by the foreign travellers, fail to attract the local communities, which is because of the lack of appreciation and acknowledgement of the local culture, among the native population. It can be remedied by increasing publicity activities, to make the people more aware. We will discuss this further, in the essay.
Most people are not completely aware of their cultural heritage and hence, do not possess a good understanding of their ancestral lineage. In other words, it causes a nonchalant attitude among the local people, when it comes to places of historical importance. For example, a recent study by the American Psychiatrists' Association, (APA), claimed that more people were likely to visit a museum in a foreign land, rather than the one in their locality. Therefore, it is illustrative of how local communities lack a real understanding and appreciation of their culture.
One possible way to tackle the problem would be to increase publicity activities, to garner local attention. Specific information about the sites can be spread through flyers, mass media, and via the internet. Moreover, increasing awareness and educating the population by such approaches will attract the native crowd. For instance, a museum in India, recorded a two-fifth rise in the visits by the local population, following several publicity activities. Besides, another possible solution would be to invest more in reconstruction and renovation strategies, by channelling more funds towards the cause by government bodies.
In conclusion, sites of historical significance are visited less by the locals because of a lack of appreciation and understanding of the local culture, which can be combatted by more publicities and sufficient government funding. With these suggested measures, there will be an increasing percentage of local people visiting museums and historical sites, in the future.
- Describe the diagram about the hydroelectric dam 78
- Worldwide mobile phone sales in 2005 2006 share of market 83
- oil consumption by major consumers 67
- Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student s performance Continual assessment such as course work and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Describe the diagram about the hydroelectric dam 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54515050167 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2036467906 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548494983278 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5089635825 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.428571429 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18687065823 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628719387297 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519488379907 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121639431013 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414996474601 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54515050167 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2036467906 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548494983278 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5089635825 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.428571429 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18687065823 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628719387297 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519488379907 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121639431013 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414996474601 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.