nowadays children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things. What are the reasons and what measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or creative things?
Nowadays, the issue that children are highly engaged in watching television has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although this concern can be attributed to a whole host of reasons, some feasible solutions should be taken into account to address this problem.
There are a number of reasons to explain screen addiction in children. First, since there are thousands of attractive entertaining shows, movies, and music at disposal, they trigger children’s curiosity to binge-watch all day. In fact, intriguing motions and contents on TV makes children glue their eyes on, which also makes them lose track of time and forget other priorities, like studying. Second, by working with full-time schedules, parents have no choice but to leave their children with TV for mental rewards. This means that they hardly find enough time to play with their offspring, making children resort to watching TV in their free time.
Nevertheless, several actions should be taken by parents and schools to encourage children to spend more time on more fun alternatives. First, since parents are a child’s primary role models, they should devote more time to taking part in activities with their children. For instance, kids will be appealed to creative things such as solving riddles or puzzles rather than spending hours watching TV if their parents become their partners in such beneficial games, which leads to a separation between children and sedentary lifestyles with screens. Second, kids would engage more in outdoor activities if schools held regular field trips in which students have opportunities to plant trees or take care of animals. This means that students could learn about nature with their own eyes and feeling in lieu of being monotonous with books in classes, which encourages them to participate in outdoor activities to discover more interesting things.
In conclusion, screen addiction in children is caused by several reasons. However, by caring more about kids, parents and school officials can encourage them to engage lead a proactive lifestyle which is beneficial to child developments now and down the road.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-20 | an@123 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | cassiexo | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | cassiexo | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Nguyenx Trần Minh Trí | view | |
| 2023-06-17 | Nguyenx Trần Minh Trí | view |
- Many men and women are making the decision to have children later in life Why is this trend occurring What are the impacts of this development 78
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of th 61
- In some cultures children are often told they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 67
- The graph below shows the US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services 89
- Obesity is a problem in many developed countries and some people believe that a tax on fast food could reduce the problem DO you think this will be possible 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3185840708 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6721007363 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59587020649 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.270880019 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.785714286 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318579966132 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111801243751 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738648537452 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164893972124 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0923330260785 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.