Some people believe online reading materials should only be used for a child to learn to read whereas others believe only printed material should be used. Discuss both views and give your opinion
It is an irrefutable fact that, digital media has taken giant place in education system nowadays. Some people deem that, online plateform for learning purpose is necessity, while others have argue with digitalization and they think that, printed books and other material could help better. However, I advocate that online and internet medium should be used in education of children as it is more beneficial compare to books. This essay will discuss both sides with exaples to demonstrate points to prove arguments.
To begin with, online materials have more visuality than printed one and parallelly online medium is more lucrative for children. Additionally, children's nature always attracted with digital gadgets rather than printed books. Sometime they may not find books interesting. Economic factor plays crucial role because financial burden can be mitigated by using technology for learning. For example, if any childlearn reading and writing from online education, than less printed materials and professional teachers required. In consequences education fess will be reduced automatically. It saves tree if printing reduced in education system.
On the contrary side, some people opine that, printing materials are more pivotal than online because it is conventional method of Education. Entire education system can not work without paper and pen practice for child. Moreover, eyesight is also affected by light emmited from screen if child spend long time with online medium, whereas no detrimental effect of printing materials. Child can concentrate more with paper base books and able to comprehend meaning of text well and it is not possible with online gadgets.
In recapitulation, both printed paper base material and online media play essential role in education system in modern era. But, I deem that, online media is the fastest way for children as their grasping power is more with visuality compare to printed materials.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-13 | Anjanakanal D | 84 | view |
| 2020-07-13 | urvashi saxena | 89 | view |
| 2020-07-09 | urvi eva | 89 | view |
| 2020-05-07 | pushpak | 89 | view |
| 2020-04-25 | ronak65767 | 84 | view |
- Some people believe online reading materials should only be used for a child to learn to read whereas others believe only printed material should be used Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Some people believe online reading materials should only be used for a child to learn to read whereas others believe only printed material should be used Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- In some countries some criminal trials in law courts are shown on television so that the general public can watch Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television However television can not replace the book as a learning tool which is why children are less educated today To what extent do you agree with this statement 78
- Some parents are worried about the increasing level of violence in TV video games and other types of entertainment for children s leisure How does this affect children How do you think this problem can be tackled 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'argued'.
Suggestion: argued
...purpose is necessity, while others have argue with digitalization and they think that...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, whereas, while, for example, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70956331045 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593333333333 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3835136178 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7058823529 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6470588235 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35294117647 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252900289274 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079076572765 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543895443363 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160165734742 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396324745281 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.