Families who do not send their children to public schools should not be required to pay taxes that support universal education. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The education system, in most of the countries, is mainly supported by the government while private schools are expensive as private organisations maintain them. Some people opine that parents, who send their children to private schools, should be exempted from paying tax for education as they pay the full amount of education to a private school. I personally disagree with this proposed policy.
First of all, the government does not force anyone to educate his children in a private school. If someone chooses to send his child to a private school, he accepts the higher fee willingly. From a practical point of view, affluent citizens send their children to private schools and they are higher tax payers. If they are excused from the tax, the government would have a hard time managing the state-supported education system. Besides, a double standard in tax would create an outcry among the populace.
Secondly, all citizens should spontaneously pay the education tax to fulfil their duty to the country. The money collected through tax is used to run the education system of the country.
Finally, not all citizens utilise the services that are provided to the public by the tax payers money. For instance, many city-dwellers always turn to private health care services despite they pay taxes for the state-owned medical facilities. This is why dual tax policy for individuals who send their offspring to a private school would deteriorate the whole tax collecting system.
In conclusion, I strongly support that every citizen, no matter whether they send their children to public or private schools, should pay the tax to contribute to enhancing the education system of the country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-01 | JAY9923 | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-03 | Fatehaulakh09 | 56 | view |
| 2020-04-27 | Erdenetuya | 56 | view |
| 2020-04-26 | erkhemzaya | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-15 | thuyduong2711 | 73 | view |
- The chart below gives information about historical data of the global gold demand for the last decade Summarise the information 73
- Families who do not send their children to public schools should not be required to pay taxes that support universal education To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19272727273 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74227630607 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527272727273 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3282242886 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2974379288 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117913324776 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683817806066 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192857410363 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493474689356 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.