Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Working hours affect the quality of people in large extent. As our life is deeply twisted with our job, we should balance the amount of working hour and other personal things we have during our day. Human's body and mind have to be fresh in order to perform well during the day, therefore, in my opininon it is better to have a job for five days a week for shorter hours than three days a week for long hours. Although some believe that long hours working in few days is more economic in transportation fees, I prefer the opposite one.
First, it should be considered that our body has a capacity for work. In case we work a lot during a week, our health would be overshadowed. The standard working hour in world has set the working hours for about eight hours a day which is in consistent to a healthy body. Exceeded hours result in problems in spine, back or muscles. For example, I remember a barber who worked for fortheen hours per day as he had many costumers in his salon. After few years, he had to halten the job as his spine were injured extremely.
Second, our mind needs to get fresh as well as our body after a working day. As the data we received from the environment, job tasks etc., are large, we need to take a rest after a regular working hour. In this case, our mind operates carefully, creatively and efficiently. As a matter of fact, long working hours for a day only wastes our time as our productivity highly declines after some hours. An example occured to me few months ago that I couldn't solve a problem after a long busy day although the issue was serious for me. The day after, I easily realize the answer which was not anymore difficult for me. My mind didn't fuction well due to the tiredness.
In conclusion, to keep the work result accurate and stay in a well mood, working for five days in shorter hours has the priority than working for three days in loger hours. Sufficient working hours, leads people to feel more joy in their life beside earning money and obtaining social reputation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- TPO 60 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- TPO 57 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The best way to truly relax and reduce stress is to spend time alone Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone online games and social networking Web site 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Use specific reasons and examples to support 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 447, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ple occured to me few months ago that I couldnt solve a problem after a long busy day a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 623, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...s not anymore difficult for me. My mind didnt fuction well due to the tiredness. In...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, in short, as a matter of fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.4435483871 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35364008135 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516129032258 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3142808977 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5789473684 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73684210526 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385820943674 0.236089414692 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125810722404 0.076458572812 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984267759931 0.0737576698707 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274411482512 0.150856017488 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846004610706 0.0645574589148 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.