Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
A glance at people's attitude toward education funds brings to the light a question that has been asked several times, namely, whether it is more important to dedicate money on the education of very young children than to spend money on universities. Although some peoples assert that universities are the integral part of research and development of a country, I, as a graduate pharmacy reject this opinion and believe that very young adults build the country.
The foremost reason why I am supporting this idea lies in the fact that without educated young children, the universities get vacant without any students. As a matter of fact, if individuals do not know fundamentals courses, they are not eligible to take advanced courses. It is obvious that the first step to improve education system is elementary schools. Therefore, devoting more budget to elementary schools is necessary.
Another subtle point that I should deem is the fact that students, after graduation from high school, can get scholarship and immigrate to other top universities to continue their education and then come back to serve the country. For example, annually a lot of students from the entire world get admission to Harvard University which is one of the top ranked university in the world. After obtaining a decent degree, students return to their home country and bring back their knowledge and experience. This can happen only if they have a great academic background before college ages. Thus, it is logical that a country contribute financial aid to education of very young pupils.
Admittedly, contribution to universities have several benefits. One of the most important advantages is that the universities improve their equipment and resources and hire outstanding professor. Then they can admit international students and get tuitions. Tuition is a good way to reimburse the country. Nevertheless, I still think that it takes a long time for a university to reach to a point that international students want to study there, and until that point, a lot of money must be spent on the university expenses. So, it is more frugal to spend money on a way that has a better outcome.
Due to the aforementioned argument explored in the previous statements, I highly recommend governments to devote the budget on elementary schools instead of universities to develop successfully.
- Should your government place a tax on the junk food and fatty snacks? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex 90
- Agree or disagree?Freindship is waste of time and we have to spend our time on sth valuable. 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nevertheless, so, still, then, therefore, thus, for example, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1984.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97902097546 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546875 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.758127054 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.222222222 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250317202141 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659167012551 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653330891425 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127905127897 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639590721812 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.