Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Understanding the past is beneficial for individuals because they can learn important things from the history. However, studying history at universities due to the ordinance is a different story. Personally, I believe that educational organizations should not force learners to attend history classes. I feel this way for two main reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, individuals can read events in the past from other sources, which means enrolling history courses at post-secondary institutions may be ineffective for pupils. Many youngsters have access to various books and information about episodes in the past. Therefore, they have basic knowledge about history. Unfortunately, undergraduates will only attend introductory courses in which professors talk about fundamental ideas about history, so students will only read and hearken to what they already know. As a result, they will end up ruining their tuition fees to peruse the information with which they are familiar. For example, I have been reading books about Genghis Khan since I was young, so I absorbed satisfactory knowledge about the history of Mongolia, my native country. Unluckily, when I attend lectures about the history of the Mongols empire, I only wasted fees of the course because I was already familiar with this information of the curriculum. This example demonstrates how introductory courses of history might be nonsense for individuals knowing about basic concepts.
Secondly, pupils will not immerse themselves to study courses that are unrelated to their major study, so they will forget their lesson before long. Most students tend to work hard when they know that concepts from academic disciplines if they know that data from these fields of study will help them in the future. Furthermore, they struggle to prevent forgetting this valuable knowledge so that they can use it later on. On the other hand, they will simply forget ideas mentioned in the history course if they know that this information is not associated with the branch they study. For instance, last semester, my companion who is going to become a programmer attended a history course due to the rule of his university. However, he said that he recalls nothing from lectures of this class because he thought that this information is useless.
In summation, I am of the opinion that universities do not have to require undergraduate students to enroll in history courses. This is because students are unlikely to learn something new, and they are liable to forget these things soon.
- In the United States medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms However there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which information about patients is stored in ele 90
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs Many pterosaurs were very large some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were capabl 70
- Topic Some people like to eat in restaurants and at foodstands others like to eat at home Which do you prefer Give reasons and examples to support your choice 80
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the 66
- TPO 30 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i feel, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2182.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28329297821 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88701907507 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513317191283 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1085516187 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.1 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.65 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142774912183 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501619587643 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042185447062 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0964098658135 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184781528613 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.