It is commonly believed that, in life, success is not the most important thing. It is more important to remain happy and optimistic when we fail.
Today, there is a controversial debate between psychologists about the human's performance in facing life problems. Although some assert that people should hope to future after failure, I do believe that human being either win or lose should focus on prospering in confronting the problems on which I will elaborate my reasons in the subsequent essay.
Firstly, providing both safety and peace to life habitat is the most severe concern of human beings. Today humans are threatened by different issues that are natural, such as earthquake and disease, or are personal, like war; hence, they have a significant competition among themselves to conquer the threats, and they should prepare themselves for that. For example, consider two different nations that are surrounded by enemies. One of them has instructed to be successful also, has prepared for such this condition; conversely, the other one hopes to the problems be solved by themselves in an optimistic form. In this circumstance, the prosperous nation would be able to tolerate the attack and probably win the war, but the optimistic one would be defeated since it has not been prepared. Thus, the human need to create a shield to protect themselves, and this would not be able just by being optimistic and thinking the obstacles would be solved; people should have a plan for succeeding, and they do not have the right to disappoint amid the problems.
Moreover, success has a dormant impact on humans' attitudes and lifestyles, while feelings like happiness have a temporary effect. To be more specific, phenomena that influence people's character, structure their attitude infrastructure and lifestyle since reminds them who they are and who should be. In contrast, contemporary feels like being optimistic or happy has a temporary effect that disappears soon. For example, in Middle East countries, governments force students to attend success classes that instruct them to be prosperous in the future. Psychologists believe that teaching students how to be prosperous would help them to save success as a dormant adjective in their character that helps them to boost their confidence in facing the problems.
To sum up, prospering in life is a crucial aspect in the life since not only does it help human to defeat their restrains in real life, but it also helps them to have a happy lifestyle and do not deviate from their life goals.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-07-13 | Zmx_6 | 80 | view |
2023-07-13 | Zmx_6 | 76 | view |
2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 83 | view |
2022-11-30 | joyce05 | 70 | view |
2022-11-11 | ctoluwasedaniel | 86 | view |
- Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is viewed as a bad quality for a person to have But now it is considered as a good quality of a person Do you agree or disagree 92
- Some lessons for young students increase their interest to learn including video games But some people believe it will distract young students What is your opinion Why 88
- Some lessons for young students 5 8 years old increase their interest to learn including video games But some people believe it will distract young students What is your opinion Why 73
- High school teachers teachers of students ages 14 18 spend most of class time lecturing speaking while the students listen and take notes Other high school teachers spend most of class time on discussion and projects that students are highly involved in a 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for students to study art and literature than it is to study math and science Provide reasons and examples to support your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
... debate between psychologists about the humans performance in facing life problems. Al...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... do not deviate from their life goals.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, in contrast, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2020.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15306122449 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82729949757 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522959183673 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.5735191265 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.285714286 100.406767564 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.6045352989 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104647217276 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423619328623 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0298569987307 0.0737576698707 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0709013184033 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026832937457 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 11.7677419355 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.