A large amount of advertisements are now targeted at children. Many people say this has negative effects on children and should, therefore, be banned.
To what extant do you agree or disagree?
According to many denizens, child can able to acquire some positivities until the aim of commercial breaks is clear to produce splendid knowledge or they are restricted. I, however, could not agree with this notion, ensuing paragraphs are providing arguments of my perspective on this phenomena.
To embark with, certainly, with several intentions, teenagers can seek appropriate life lessons out of visualising advertises. First and foremost, for children, crimes related advertisements are being run for a short time period. This is advantageous for saving time or accomplishing great lessons, which can be learnt and incorporated in their life. For example, when I was a young child, I had always been instructed to watch some ads which pertain to violation because I intended to study how I should avoid committing a crime in future. Ultimately, it is necessary for children to visualise some advertises instead of watching shows, especially when it comes to earning crime-related knowledge.
In addition, a multitude of a child is capable of opting their loved things, be it clothes or sporting pieces of equipment, this owing to their avarice of watching advertisements. Children are shown adorable things in that commercial breaks, which have a huge chunk of knowledge to be bought, also at shops time of choosing a particular equipment is not wasted because children have already consciousness to select the best thing. Eventually, what is essential for children to choose splendid things? Watching advertisements are useful to avoid wasting quality of time period and children get to know what are good things for them.
In conclusion, pros should be occurred if some children aimed advertises have not abounded. That benefits, including leisurely walk in future and make an appropriate chooses for best products.
- The chart shows use of social media by men and women in Austrelia in 2007 and 2014. 22
- The diagram below shows the stages in the recycling of aluminium drinks cans
- The diagram below shows the stages in the recycling of aluminium drink cans 90
- The graph below gives information about U.S government spending on research between 1980 and 2008. 78
- The pie chart shows the percentage of seals made in different genres by a bookstore in 2017 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...roviding arguments of my perspective on this phenomena. To embark with, certainl...
^^^^
Line 3, column 531, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...y how I should avoid committing a crime in future. Ultimately, it is necessary for childr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 325, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'particular equipment'.
Suggestion: particular equipment
... bought, also at shops time of choosing a particular equipment is not wasted because children have alr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 152, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...uding leisurely walk in future and make an appropriate chooses for best products.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39721254355 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07657021203 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623693379791 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8598565282 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.153846154 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186294296875 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720492386331 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517196011159 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111512601876 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335591151801 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.