Many people believe that countries should produce food for the whole population and import as little food as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often argued that food production should be borne by each country completely, while import of food must be minimized. This essay disagrees with this suggestion and first, will discuss main problems of massive agricultural production for whole country and second, will illustrate disadvantages of lack of import for cookery as a multinational art.
Enormous manufacturing of food for whole population of one independent country requires the use of extensive agricultural lands. That demands availability of necessary amount of fertile ground. The continuous use of farms and gardens can lead to land degradation cause by deforestation, over-grazing, over-cultivation and/or salinization. It is therefore disagreed that countries must independently grow food for whole population. For example, The Agricultural magazine recently published the article which explained why it is requisite to give agricultural ground rest-time after intensive using. This would not be impossible in case of huge food production.
In addition, import restriction on food will limit variety of people's menu which usually includes different kinds of international food products and spices. Moreover, import some vegetables, fruits, nuts, grains, beans, fish and seafood is sorely needed due to these kinds of food constitute the basis of some international delicatessen and can not be produce in local fields or farms. The same situation appears with spices which together with import food products in modern society have become multinational cookery representing European, Asian and American cookery. For instance, there are two or even three different kinds of kitchen in one menu of typical restaurant in Kiev, Ukraine, where citizens and guests of the city can be introduced to Ukrainian kitchen along with Asian, for example. It becomes therefore new normal to try multinational taste.
In conclusion, it is very problematical and even dangerous for lands to produce food for whole population within one country and the limits of food import will only aggravate the problem.
- The government should reduce the amount of money spend on local environmental problems and instead increase funding into urgent and more threatening issues such as global warming To what extent do you agree 73
- Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development 61
- Countries should spend moneyn on trains rather than new roads Do you agree or disagree 87
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Countries should spend moneyn on trains rather than new roads Do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 859, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... new normal to try multinational taste. In conclusion, it is very problematical ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63782051282 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14343020206 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592948717949 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1903277399 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.642857143 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314042385881 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112918386555 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978681227427 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218367826882 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567356195992 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.