The chart below gives information about Southland’s main exports in 2000, *20.., and future projections for 2025.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the number of income from Southland’s three main groups of exports in the years of 2000 and 2020 also for prospective projections in 2025.
According to the data, international tourism gave the most revenue to Southland from all main exports in three different year. In 2000, international tourism contributed approximately 8 billion to the city. The following 20 years, the revenue kept growing to nearly 9 billion. Southland predicted this variant of export will exceed to just 10 billion within 5 years. There had some significant difference to the rest 2 exports. Dairy products’ revenue in 2000 was only around 7 billion, but the number rose rapidly approaching to 10 billion. These products foresaw the income will fall slightly to just above of 9 billion. Lastly, meat products had the lowest revenue than the other exports. Starting with exactly 6 billion as the revenue in 2000, the digit kept decreasing to around 5.5 billion and predicted will also decrease to 5 billion in next 5 years.
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The table shows existing and projected changes in the proportion of people over 65 in the populations of three countries from 2015 to 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 43
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 53
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08284023669 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84241780158 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585798816568 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9166629044 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125577569985 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541335486432 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744063810933 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161847328976 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.094018236069 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.