smart cars
The reading and the listening are both about smart cars, which are vehicles that are able to drive themselves. The author of the reading describes three benefits related to these cars. The professor casts doubt on each of the theories presented in the reading. She does not feel that the cars are as beneficial as the author assumes.
First of all, the author states that smart cars will save lives by preventing accidents. It is noted that the sensor and computer systems used in the smart cars are more efficient than human judgment when it comes to preventing accidents. The lecturer casts doubt on this assertion. She is of the opinion that smart cars will still get into accidents. Moreover, she believes that if smart car technology leads to denser traffic than before, certain types of accidents will be even worse than they currently are.
Secondly, the author claims that smart cars will lead to the end of traffic problems. The article says that this will result from the fact that smart cars can follow each other closely at higher speeds than regular cars. The lecturer challenges this theory. She states that if driving becomes more convenient, more people will opt to join in. She says that with an increased number of cars on the road, traffic congestion will actually increase.
Finally, the author points out that smart cars will reduce the cost of driving. As a result of the fact that smart cars are programmed to take very direct routes, owner will not need to spend as much money on repairs and replacement parts. The professor, on the other hand, points out that smart cars utilize a lot of expensive technology not implemented in regular cars. She says that repairing this sort of technology will be more costly than repairing the parts in a normal vehicle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-17 | Julie.Zhu | 85 | view |
| 2022-12-27 | villian7 | 75 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | YAGUT | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | Tanvayee15 | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-17 | Prabesh Dhakal | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The extended family grandparents cousins aunts and uncles is less important now than it was in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smartphones cell phones with Internet access while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch Which point of view do you think is better and why 76
- There s no doubt that Turtle Excluder Devices are a great idea that must be used by every single shrimping boat However they are far from perfect and in need of drastic improvement regardless of what the author in the reading may believe 81
- Online shopping is increasing significantly What effects might be on the environment and the types of jobs which are required for it 73
- It has been observed that most of the students at University do not choose science to study Why this problem happens What are the effects on society 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s three benefits related to these cars. The professor casts doubt on each of the th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, sort of, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83713355049 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33557530139 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508143322476 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9298012419 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0555555556 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 4.33554083885 300% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.444535205434 0.272083759551 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165142145408 0.0996497079465 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133176119332 0.0662205650399 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29854962269 0.162205337803 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0926006484068 0.0443174109184 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.