People learn things from those at their own level – such as fellow students or co-workers – than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors
There is an ever-going debate on whether people pick things from their such counterparts as colleagues, and peers or someone from an upper level like a professor or supervisor at work. I believe that the things that people learn from their peers and co-workers are outnumber learning from a teacher or manager. I will explore my two reasons for this opinion throughout this essay.
To begin with, asking vague information or unclear part to a peer or to a colleague is easier. This is because since there are no hierarchical differences involved, people would be more comfortable to ask questions, even the one that they think are the dumbest questions. My very own experience would be a great example of this regard, when I was at the university, I found some classes were highly complex and had the struggle to follow the contents of these course for a long time. When I tried to ask my lecturers, I thought they were judgemental towards my questions and moreover, they were mainly criticizing my logical understanding. After a while, I started to ask my questions to the most successful student in my class, she was so nice to me and she was explaining all the misunderstanding parts to me, therefore, in the end, I was able to pass all these extremely complicated lecturers with high grades. If I would have continued to ask my questions to the professors rather than my fellow student friend, I could have ended up being not passed these mentioned courses.
Secondly, since it is quite difficult to find professors and managers to ask questions due to their busy schedules, learning things from them is not highly likely to be possible. Meanwhile, people spend a tremendous amount of work and school time with their colleagues and peers. For this very reason, getting new knowledge from them is easier than someone from higher levels of work or academic statue. For instance, one of my cousin when she started to work at her current law firm, she was so lost and confused in many situations. I remember listening from her office stories that her manager was never at the office, he was always travelling to find new clients for their law firm, therefore, when confusion occurred she always went her co-workers to get a clear understanding of the situation, as she is now head of the law firm, she always says that she owns her success to her co-workers and without their guidance, she would not have come to this possession.
To conclude, I believe that people learn new knowledge from their peers and co-workers rather than their professors or supervisors. This is because, asking questions to someone who has the same title as you is much more easier and since people from higher levels are generally quite busy with their own responsibilities it is not easy to find them available to learn.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-20 | Alana Gerber | 88 | view |
| 2022-12-29 | villian7 | 68 | view |
| 2022-11-18 | rpinisetti8 | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-11 | Tanvayee15 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | Louissun | 70 | view |
- Some people argue that job satisfaction is more important than job security while others believe that they cannot always expect job satisfaction and a permanent job is more important Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Technology has made children less creative than the past Do you agree or disagree with the statement 73
- communal online encyclopedias 68
- Online shopping is increasing significantly What effects might be on the environment and the types of jobs which are required for it 73
- Great Houses 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outnumbered'.
Suggestion: outnumbered
...arn from their peers and co-workers are outnumber learning from a teacher or manager. I w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 920, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had continued'?
Suggestion: had continued
...icated lecturers with high grades. If I would have continued to ask my questions to the professors r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...e who has the same title as you is much more easier and since people from higher levels are...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 74.0 43.0788530466 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2325.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 483.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81366459627 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77390219545 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490683229814 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 703.8 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.3330451247 48.9658058833 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.3125 100.406767564 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1875 20.6045352989 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288743324946 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106071483203 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109471873372 0.0737576698707 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221913358312 0.150856017488 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124149061592 0.0645574589148 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.