Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that money would do better on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that it is pointless to spend time and money on protecting wild animals, and the money should be spent on people who are suffering. I totally disagree with this opinion.
The protection of wild animals can promote biodiversity and help maintain a healthy ecosystem. Biodiversity is essential for a healthy and functional ecosystem, and the continuous extinction of animals is a blow to biodiversity, which will gradually lead to a disturbed ecosystem. As a result, natural disasters would happen and harm human beings. For example, there a wide diversity of species in tropical rainforests. If any species dies out, food chains will get destroyed, which might lead to the extinction of other animals. Eventually, human beings will be affected because residents there rely on those animals as food recourses.
Moreover, the protection of wildlife indirectly brings benefits to the community. There is no more convincing example of wildlife reserves. Although the aim of any natural reserves is protecting animals, it could improve the environment and relieve the pollution. As planets keep conducting photosynthesis, carbon dioxide is being transformed into oxygen, acid is being resolved, and toxic substance is being decomposed. On top of that, the protection of wildlife could create jobs, helping solve the unemployment. For example, there will be a considerable need for animal keepers and guiders in zoos and ocean parks, reserver protectors in natural reserves, researchers in institutes. Finally, zoos and safaris attract large amounts of visitors, and part of the incomes from which is given to governments as tax. This stable income could be spent on constructing a prosperous community and improving residents’ life quality.
In conclusion, I totally disagree with the opinion that too much time and money have been wasted on the protection of animals. On the contrary, we human beings are benefited from it either directly or indirectly.
- Newspapers are having enormous influence on people s ideas and opinions Why is this the case Is is a positive or negative development 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- New technologies change the way children spend their free time Do the advantages of these changes outweigh the disadvantages 78
- In some countries people waste a lot of food which is bought in shops and restaurants What do you think are the reasons What can be done to solve this problem 78
- Even though people read the news using the internet nowadays newspapers still are an important source of information for the general public the majority of people Do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... I totally disagree with this opinion. The protection of wild animals can promo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 638, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ely on those animals as food recourses. Moreover, the protection of wildlife ind...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the contrary, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42857142857 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03699708989 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577922077922 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8380620233 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8888888889 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180504704238 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539174823885 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072591135926 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142835985872 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0958744357776 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.