Some people believe that women should play an equal role as men in a country`s police force or military force, while others think women are not suitable for these kinds of jobs. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, an increasing number of women is choosing to work in a country’s police force or military force. While some hold the opinion that women are not suitable for these two fields, I believe that women should be able to work in the police force or army.
Many people believe that women are not capable of undertaking missions in the defence force. One of the main reasons is the physical and mental strength differences between men and women. Women are predisposed to have inferior physical qualities compared with men. However, many missions in the police force or military force contains incentive trainings, which far surpass the intensity a woman’s body could bear. Not to mention in some extreme situations, like confronting terrorists or criminals, women who are lack of toughness and powerful body might put themselves into danger.
However, I think this is a narrow view, and women could play an important role in police and military force. It is undeniable that a strong mentality and body are essential requirements in these fields. However, women are more likely to have qualifications which are crucial in those jobs, like teamwork and negotiation abilities, and thus, help complete a mission. For example, policewomen are more good at controlling a chaotic situation, and tend to be more persuasive in negotiations. Moreover, people should be chosen for jobs according to their abilities, qualifications, characters rather than genders. For example, there are some women who have a more robust body and power than average men.
In conclusion, even though women may be less advantaged than men in terms of physical strength, other qualifications they hold enable them to play a crucial role in police or military force.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-05 | hanhkatori2402 | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-11 | MingThui | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-19 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-16 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-16 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- In some countries people waste a lot of food which is bought in shops and restaurants What do you think are the reasons What can be done to solve this problem 78
- Even though people read the news using the internet nowadays newspapers still are an important source of information for the general public the majority of people Do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that money would do better on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 507, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...fronting terrorists or criminals, women who are lack of toughness and powerful body mig...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ucial role in police or military force.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20921985816 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85079256675 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539007092199 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.885235482 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.928571429 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412458433704 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137897037091 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101811186509 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25744015552 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106941274298 0.056905535591 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.