The rise of convenience food has helped people keep up with the speed of modern lifestyle. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, it cannot be denied that the development of convenience foods plays an essential role in bringing people closer to the present-day pace of life. There are certainly some positive as well as negative outcomes to this scenario, however, it is my belief that the effects have been, on the whole, more advantageous.
A crucial award in the expenditure of ready-made food is consumers’ diversified experience. The booming market of this kind of product grants customers with multiform foods ranging from regional origin, preciosity, packaging to prices; hence, purchasers can choose any type to their taste. An excellent example would be Timor Leste, a developing country with a limited volume of foreign chefs, has provided its people with processed victuals from more than one hundred nations by its import strategy. Already prepared foods are also highly promising in terms of convenience and comfort due to its easy access and time-saving feature. At all hours of the day or night, people can buy processed foods whether at a street corner, a local delivery van or at an eight-till-late mini-supermarket, and they can instantly cook with ease. A recent survey at Cambridge University found that convenience foods save people in UK 65% of cooking time compared to self-prepared one.
On the other hand, the growing consumption of fast food could make people weak from lack of sustenance since a great deal of carbohydrates and fats are contained. Nevertheless, the buoyant market of convenience foods has brought about an improvement in aliment quality, particularly better food value with more essential nutrients and roughage, which provides a more balanced diet for consumers. To illustrate this case, a report of the Vietnamese Ministry of Industry and Trade in 2019 stated that the processed foods industry recorded more than 30% of the enterprises trading in organic and fresh convenient foods.
All above points considered, it is therefore safe to say that the great vague of already-made foods, which leads to diversity in customers’ experience, ease of use and access, obviously prevails the flawed argument on health problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-07 | HoangNguyen27 | 89 | view |
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee 49
- The rise of convenience food has helped people keep up with the speed of modern lifestyle Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The graph below shows the average monthly temperature in three major cities Summarize the information by selecting the reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the average monthly temperature in three major cities Summarize the information by selecting the reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK schools in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 513, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'foods'' or 'food's'?
Suggestion: foods'; food's
...Trade in 2019 stated that the processed foods industry recorded more than 30% of the ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, kind of, as well as, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3137829912 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01134612222 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639296187683 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.4266523937 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.0 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4166666667 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184515151216 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666020744605 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0284676730505 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096276190243 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597144333745 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.