The table below shows thenumbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
The table compares the total quantity of people visiting Ashdown Museum over the year before and after it was restored, while the pie charts illustrate their satisfaction levels during the same two periods.
Overall, the higher number of visitors after the museum was renovated. Besides, their satisfaction level increased significantly.
The year before refurbishment with the total number of visitors to Ashdown Museum at 74,000. After the museum was repaired, the figure for people visiting Ashdown Museum at 92,000. The number of visitors increased by nearly 25%.
The year before the renovation, half of the people visiting the Ashdown Museum felt dissatisfaction ( with 40% of dissatisfied and 10% of very dissatisfied). Only 15% of visitors felt very satisfied and nearly one in three visitors cited felt satisfied. Just 5% for people visiting the Ashdown Museum had neutral opinions.
The year after the renovation, the number of people visiting the museum felt very satisfied doubled. The figure for visitors felt satisfied rose to 40%. In contrast, the number of people in low or very low satisfaction levels decreased sharply at 15% and 5%. The figure for people of no response remained steady.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 to 2010 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 67
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 to 2010 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 73
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram show the stages involed in the process of making leather goods 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the Ashdown Museum felt dissatisfaction with 40% of dissatisfied and 10% of very...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31937172775 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76883667117 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.44502617801 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5614236812 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.1538461538 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6923076923 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.38461538462 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315304910782 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125171790491 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864669380624 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202242403001 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073649829025 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.98 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.