Riverdala Public School System
The bar charts illustrate the change of spending per pupil and students percentage that passed the Reading and Math test at Riverside Public School system, between the years of 1995 and 2010 by 5 years difference.
Overall, the cost per pupil decreased significantly over the years. However, the second graph presents a slight decrease in the students’ results as well.
It is obvious that the highest spending per child was 12,000 $ in 1995.After that year, spending followed an almost constant decrease to the year of 2010 when it was named as nearly 8,000$ per student. During this time zone, most remarkable difference was between the years of 1995 and 2000.At rest, the gap was significantly similar.
On the other hand, unlike the spending, students success rate were not decreased dramatically. In 1995, it was above the 86% and became just less than 83% in 2010. The severe decline of spending of child could not reflect the same fall to percentage of success. From 1990 to 2010, the percentage of successful students at Math and Reading, decreased only 4%.
- The Bricks Manufacturing Process 78
- Riverdala Public School System 11
- People nowadays work hard to buy more things This has made our lives generally more comfortable but many traditional values and customs have been lost and this is a pity To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Riverdale Public School System 11
- Household Budget Allocations 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: CURRENCY[2]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$000'.
Suggestion: $000
...t the highest spending per child was 12,000 $ in 1995.After that year, spending follo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: After
...spending per child was 12,000 $ in 1995.After that year, spending followed an almost ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$000'.
Suggestion: $000
...r of 2010 when it was named as nearly 8,000$ per student. During this time zone, mos...
^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: At
... was between the years of 1995 and 2000.At rest, the gap was significantly similar...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02247191011 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62619750396 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629213483146 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.2163168445 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0569333215493 0.215688989381 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0214732922026 0.103423049105 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607356421233 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0483149074557 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836838744763 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.