These graphs give reasoning why some people prefer a certain transport mode to get to work Summarize the information

Essay topics:

These graphs give reasoning why some people prefer a certain transport mode to get to work.
Summarize the information.

The given pie charts highlight the main reasons for choosing a bicycle or a vehicle for commuting to work.

The predominant cause of picking a car is comfort and long distance to a destination point. At the same time, cyclist’s primary benefits are good body shape and health and negligible amount of pollution produced by their transport.

The two major reasons for choosing bicycle are health benefits and eco-tolerance. Both of them account for thirty per cent each, contributing almost two thirds, collectively. The third popular option is abundance of parking spots near to the workplace. In addition to this, about 13 per cent of cyclists consider their type of transport cheap, since it requires no money during rides. The smallest fraction of this category of people believe, that it is faster than cars.

Meanwhile, cars are more comfortable than bikes for 40 per cent of drivers. About one fifth report that the distance to their offices is long for muscular mean of transport. Speed and ability to move things to work easily is named to be the primary reasons for 14 per cent each. The least portion of car drivers prefer their type of transport because of safety.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-06-11 vdrobny 78 view
Essays by user vdrobny :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to bicycle'
Suggestion: to bicycle
.... The two major reasons for choosing bicycle are health benefits and eco-tolerance. ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, third, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9648241206 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62686729914 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623115577889 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.9351378782 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.3333333333 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5833333333 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0970579598403 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0356666131911 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03015716696 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0599723549081 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236903212752 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.