Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.
Today's most decisions are based on experience and learning, and we try to correlate past events with the present to get the best result in any situation. The prompt suggests that knowledge of past events can not help us to make crucial decisions today. In my opinion, I do not agree with the recommendation because of the following reasons.
To begin with, humans always learn from experience and tried to avoid the mistake done in the past. Because as human beings, we can not foresee the consequences of the action taken. However, we learned to make the decision based on the previous experience to eschew known error. For instance, during election time, people give their votes based on the performance of the political party in their last term. Consequently, if people feel that the current ruling party isn't meeting their demands, they may vote for other promising parties. Hence, most of the political campaign shows their previous years achievements to seek public attention. The public can not decide based on their present promises, because any party can make gigantic promises, but few can fulfill it. The above example demonstrates that it is necessary to know about past performance and experience to decide the present vote. Thus, It's feasible to say that our knowledge about the previous experience helps us decide today's valuable decisions.
Furthermore, it's best to analyze the situation before making critical decisions; hence experience served as a perfect data set because it is the only known thing. When we do a critical analysis of the given scenario, we encounter the future shortcomings as well as already happened mistakes. Past left the significant effects on anyone's mind; whether it's good or bad, both remain in the spirit of people. For example, one company wants to hire a person in the CEO position. It is a critical thing for any company to handover the business decision on one person's hand. So, the company takes the interview of the applied candidate and sort the best-fit according to their response. At the same time, the company scrutinizes the past behavior and performance of the sorted candidate before hiring. Consequently, if any candidate excelled during the interview but was involved in corruption or any other conspiracy in his last company, then he will get rejected. On the contrary, if the person showed extraordinary performance during his previous years and has the right reputation name in the market, he has more chances to be selected for the CEO post. The above example illustrates that knowing the past helps best in the present to make crucial decisions.
Some may argue that what happened in the past stayed in the past and have no effects on the present. For example, one company wants to expand its business in a new country. Consequently, the latest market norms and ethics are different from the last market, and the company can not adopt its past strategy in the new market. However, specific characteristics of the human remain the same at any place which company can use in the new market. Hence, still, we can use several past experiences in the present decision-making process.
All things considering, we can say that in the decision-making process, previous experience and knowledge play an essential role. We can eliminate some of the adverse outcomes using our expertise.
- Leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them 50
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems 50
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well being of the societies and environments in which they operate Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations provided they operate within the law is to make as mu 54
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a journal on environmental issues Over the past year the Crust Copper Company CCC has purchased over 10 000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia Mining copper on this land will in 76
- Claim Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Reason We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 467, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ople feel that the current ruling party isnt meeting their demands, they may vote fo...
^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...to make crucial decisions. Some may argue that what happened in the past stayed i...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 476, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...arket. Hence, still, we can use several past experiences in the present decision-making process....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 148, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lay an essential role. We can eliminate some of the adverse outcomes using our expertise.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, still, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, as well as, in my opinion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2802.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 554.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05776173285 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85151570047 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76633249962 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476534296029 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 886.5 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3939578186 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.6206896552 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1034482759 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86206896552 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219115621718 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618121219151 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758886144563 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132127646146 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583651657906 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.