summarize the points made in the lecture ,being sure to explain how they cast a doubt on the specific theories in the reading passage.
Altruism
The professor in the lecture refutes the all examples which explain the altruism of animal.According to the recent experimental study she disagrees with the human and animal altruism behavior which is mentioned in the passage.
Firstly, She explains the behavior of meerkat. The meerkat eats before going to as a sentinel.The guard meerkat is full of stomach before going to a sentinel. The second things is that the sentinel escapes first after giving the alaram when sentinel see any predator. Actually sentinel try to save his life by giving the alaram to their group. So that the predator attension goes on another group members instead of sentinel.So that's why the professor said the sentinel meerkat behavior is not altruistic. She refutes that the sentinel meekat save their group life by puting his life in to danger.
The second example is about the human. The professor said that, the donar get the token of apprecition from the family member and from stranger when they donate any part of body. According to professor the non material thing is also valueable. So there is no feeling of sacrifice . Because the donar get the appretition.She contradicts the donar example which mentioned in the passage ,that giving their body organ is one of the altruism.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2014-03-12 | deepali1234 | 40 | view |
- Recommendation letter by project guide 90
- Essay The Sydney Opera House 76
- . Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In 20 years from now on, students will not use printed books any more . 78
- summarize the point made in the lecture ,being sure to explain how they are oppose the specific points made in the reading passage . 60
- It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay. 75
when sentinel see any predator. Actually sentinel try to save his life by giving the alaram to their group. So
when sentinel sees any predator. Actually sentinel tries to save his life by giving the alarm to its group. So
She refutes that the sentinel meekat save their group life by puting his life in to danger.
She refutes that the sentinel meekat saves his group life by putting his life in danger.
the donar get the token of apprecition
the donor gets the token of appreciation
She contradicts the donar example which mentioned in the passage
She contradicts the donar example which is mentioned in the passage
Sentence: The second things is that the sentinel escapes first after giving the alaram when sentinel see any predator.
Error: alaram Suggestion: alarm
Sentence: Actually sentinel try to save his life by giving the alaram to their group.
Error: alaram Suggestion: alarm
Sentence: So that the predator attension goes on another group members instead of sentinel.So that's why the professor said the sentinel meerkat behavior is not altruistic.
Error: predator Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: attension Suggestion: attention
Sentence: She refutes that the sentinel meekat save their group life by puting his life in to danger.
Error: puting Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: The professor said that, the donar get the token of apprecition from the family member and from stranger when they donate any part of body.
Error: apprecition Suggestion: appreciation
Error: donar Suggestion: donor
Sentence: According to professor the non material thing is also valueable.
Error: valueable Suggestion: valuable
Sentence: Because the donar get the appretition.She contradicts the donar example which mentioned in the passage ,that giving their body organ is one of the altruism.
Error: appretition Suggestion: appreciation
Error: donar Suggestion: donor
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 9 2
Need three doubts:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 12 in 30
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 9 2
No. of Sentences: 12 12
No. of Words: 214 250
No. of Characters: 1035 1200
No. of Different Words: 103 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.825 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.836 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.393 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 78 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 58 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 38 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 17 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.833 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.915 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.583 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.352 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.527 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.115 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4