In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities.
Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
In many countries, it is argued that the significant amount of funding should be spent on building inter-city railway lines, while some people claim that it is
of importance to develop public transport. In this essay, I will be discussed both views of these arguments and reach a conclusion.
By channeling more money into constructing new railway lines, there would be a positive influence on economy and labor market. First of all, after building
new railways, the number of unemployment could be reduced significantly. For example, after building railways, the demand for permanent recruitment of operational
and maintenance workers. Another positive impact could be the reduced time for travelling across cities, and therefore, exchange goods and workforce would be considerably
grown. Some people argue that by spending more money on new railway lines, the society would gain more benefit than existing public transport.
In contrast, some critics claim that there are more advantages of improving public transport, instead. Generally, travelling within cities is inconvenient due to
high rate of traffic congestion. The official can direct more funding into existing public transport to mitigate traffic jam, along with greenhouse gases. Second benefit
of developing public transport is affordable and enjoyable traveling for commuters. As long as public transport has been improved, more people will commute on it.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the improvement of public transport will be more beneficial for the whole society. Unless public transport is developed by investing huge amount of money, new highway
lines are not likely to positively impact on the citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- 79
- Some people say that music is a good way to bring people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- The diagram shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- More and more people are relying on the private car as their major means of transportation. Describe some of the problems overreliance on cars can cause, and suggest at least ine possible solution. 67
- The table below highlights data on the number of travellers using three major British airports between 1998 and 2003. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ines, while some people claim that it is of importance to develop public transpor...
^^^
Line 4, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bor market. First of all, after building new railways, the number of unemployment...
^^^
Line 6, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oods and workforce would be considerably grown. Some people argue that by spendin...
^^^
Line 9, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing within cities is inconvenient due to high rate of traffic congestion. The off...
^^^
Line 13, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...esting huge amount of money, new highway lines are not likely to positively impac...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63953488372 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87481171475 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577519379845 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.220823114 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.928571429 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 4.38176352705 251% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3332383514 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113511187059 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586378085669 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126346201064 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606663616181 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.