Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Consider the case of software company which is headed by an incompetent CEO who has been serving his position since 6 years. The company hasn’t been doing well, with its stock market share value plummeting daily. The CEO has been remiss in his duties and wanting in his leadership values since long. There isn’t a rule which mandates the CEO to step down after a fixed tenure, and hence he continues to stay in position for as long as he desires. It is easy to see that the doomsday of this software firm wouldn’t be too far. What does the firm most direly need at this point of time? Clearly, it needs saviour in the form of a new leader that can save it from the impending doom.
It is cases like above which highlight the importance of the existing leader stepping down. The people whom the leader serves must have the discretion to be able to choose another representative if the incumbent leader isn’t able to drive his people in the prosperous direction, or choose the same leader again, as desired. The new leader, of course, should be given time to prove his mettle, but there must an end to that period, say 5 years. After his tenure comes to an end, a new leader must be elected who can turn things around for the good. Why this process is imperative is particularly highlighted in the case of Congress government which governed India for two consecutive terms of 5 years. That tenure was marked by ignominious scams and a titular prime minister. The people of India, disaffected by the government ultimately brought into power another leader. This wouldn’t have been possible had the incumbent leader been given unrestrained power to stay in service for as long as he wished. The new leadership revitalised the Indian economy, which was long due.
A new leader brings fresh perspective of things at hand. Since every individual is bestowed with a different acumen, he is able to look at things with a different eye. This particularly is beneficial when the existing leadership doesn’t look too propitious. In the absence of a law that allows the people to be able to choose a new leader after a fixed tenure, the existing leader can misuse his power and run things according to his volition, unconcerned by how it is received by his followers. This can evidently be seen in the case of North Korea, whose leader is one of the most notorious dictators. North Korea is now perceived as one of the least liveable country, owing to the oppressive laws created by its leader. This perception of the country is unlikely to change without a change of leadership.
It is not always the case that a new leader should be chosen only when the current leadership fails to achieve the set goals. Consider the example of a school which is being run by the same principal since 5 years, who has served her duties well, projecting the school on a national platform. In such a case, this principal being replaced by another principal, chosen on the basis of merit would only lead to proliferation of leaders. She can guide the new leader, impart her skills and train her to become equally good or even better. This would lead to two competitive leaders in the same school instead of one. This cycle can continue wherein the skills are efficiently and progressively imparted to new people, leading to multiple leaders. The leaders who step down can even choose to serve in other domains where their leadership might be even more valued.
A new person, anyday brings new skills and values to the table, owing to his experience, acumen and primarily due to the fact that each individual has something unique to offer. The people who choose their leaders must be able to choose another one after a fixed tenure. Of course they can choose to re-elect the same leader if they wish. This flexibility will ensure that the success of a firm, be it business, education, or government firm is not hampered, and new talent is valued.
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could 50
- Claim In any field business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 603, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at this point of time? Clearly, it needs saviour in the form of a new leader that...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, so, well, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.5258426966 184% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.3162921348 212% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 96.0 58.6224719101 164% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3252.0 2235.4752809 145% => OK
No of words: 690.0 442.535393258 156% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71304347826 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.12521717326 4.55969084622 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56124477456 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 310.0 215.323595506 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449275362319 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1008.0 704.065955056 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.2370786517 168% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3133904383 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6470588235 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2941176471 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.20588235294 5.21951772744 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10342366224 0.243740707755 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316294083189 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297959160862 0.0758088955206 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0667054786165 0.150359130593 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203554068415 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 100.480337079 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.