Government alone cannot be expected to solve environmental problems. It is also the responsibility of businesses and individuals to help.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
One must totally agree that governments alone cannot resolve the ongoing damages to the mother earth. In my opinion, it is the responsibility of every individual and corporations play major role in this. This essay will explain the views in detail.
Companies should run morally than just being legal. Many of these are taking the advantage of loopholes benefitting like evading taxes, releasing toxins and many unethical practises. Industries are heavily using the water and end up releasing danagerous chemicals into oceans, resulting in the death of many organisms and drastic climatic changes. Moreover, they are using plastics and non biodegradabale materials which will take millions of years to dissolve. An excerpt from Harvard mentioned that these corporate companies on an average consume 40% of fresh water resources and release 70% of world toxins. Nation can only set certain rules of framework, but ultimately companies have to follow them considering the damage being done in a morale.
Unfortunately, many of the citizens are throwing trash into oceans and in the public spaces. Human consumption of cosmetics, heavy shopping, shoes, food parcels, and many a things is increasing enormously. Ultimately, these end up being in the roads, ocean or a public place. For instance, research from stanford found that out of every four things bought, only one is necessary. This indicates nearly 75% will end up as garbage. It is practically impossible for the government to monitor where humans irresponsibly throw garbage. This is more of self-responsibility than any rule of law.
To conclude, government can only solve some of the problems by placing certain rules. It is ultimately the corporations and person's moral responsibility which can truly control the damage done to the nature.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-07-01 | Sumo Stark | 89 | view |
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Many foods are shipped from far away Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages You should write at least 250 word 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task You would like to buy some electrical goods at a shop in a nearby town Write a letter to the shop and ask if they have the things you want or whether they will be able to order them Ask what the prices are an 73
- Some people say it is important to keep your home and your work place tidy with everything organised and in the correct place What is your opinion about this 67
- It was predicted that people in the 21st century would have much more free time than in the past To what extent has this prediction come true 85
- Government alone cannot be expected to solve environmental problems It is also the responsibility of businesses and individuals to help To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a thing' or simply 'things'?
Suggestion: a thing; things
...shopping, shoes, food parcels, and many a things is increasing enormously. Ultimately, t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... To conclude, government can only solve some of the problems by placing certain rules. It i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, so, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37676056338 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97083580894 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633802816901 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.992237676 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8333333333 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7777777778 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 7.06120827912 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106585330744 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0326037105962 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443965131305 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775839440299 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501591939108 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.