The government should pay to the parents of very young children, so that one of them can stay at home and look after their children.
What do you think are the pros and cons of this policy? Justify your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
There is no doubt that these days, children need to a great attention from their parents.
The question is, the government must give a salary to one of baby’s parents to observation him at home.
In this essay I am going to spotlight on the merits and demerits of this phenomenon.
In terms of advantages, many of babies need to be close to her mothers in the first years of them life. The main reason given to support this claim is that nobody can take care about them than mothers and they need to breast feed. To illustrate, many babies reject breast feeding when mothers absence more than five hours. In other words, very young children will be suffering from poor nutrition.
However, this payment may be cause increase number of population. Firstly, many families will produce more babies to stay at home and at the same time get a salary.
In other words, many people will become very lazy and prefer to stay at home rather than going to work every day.
Secondly, establish baby centers more suitable to avoid increase number of population and to improve productivity of community. This is because, babies need more safe environment to spend a long time in absence of their parents. Also, these centers help babies to enjoy their times interact and communicate with other young children.
In conclusion, although, babies need their supervision of the parents, and the importance of establish high quality of babies center to improve productivity of communities.
Therefore, I believe that babies center suitable environment for babies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
... nutrition. However, this payment may be cause increase number of population. Firstly,...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, no doubt, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1296.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98461538462 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57960824511 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.7160563764 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.4 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.38176352705 205% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157225055881 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578630506892 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451239001371 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0708712287829 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384374859432 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.